Tweet
Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
Chris
-
Unless Jack the Ripper had a special kinky need for cutting hair he would have no reason for doing so. None of the victims seem to have had their hair cut by the killer.
ChrisChristopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conference
just held in Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018.
For information about RipperCon, go to http://rippercon.com/
RipperCon 2018 talks can now be heard at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/ -
He did,it seems,use the Millers Court victim's hair to wipe his hands thoughYou can lead a horse to water.....Comment
-
The hair was needed to identify the victim though.Comment
-
lock of hair
I've often wondered how true this story, https://www.etsy.com/listing/1247053...-ripper-victim, is regarding George Payne and Edward Badham's grandson.
The item is a reproduction, but what of the story?Comment
-
Not sure what a reproduction is supposed to prove?
G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
The reproduction is not the point, GUT. If the story is true, big IF, about George Payne finding the original lock of hair in Sgt. Edward Badham's belongings, then it would be significant. A reproduction is a copy of the original, as I'm sure you know.Originally posted by GUT View PostNot sure what a reproduction is supposed to prove? Comment
-
Yep....Originally posted by Riahsha View Post
That's why I refer to her as the Millers Court victimYou can lead a horse to water.....Comment
-
I have a horrible suspicion that the reason that he never cut her hair could be..
hair doesn't bleed.Comment
-
Yes I'm sure she'd prefer being referred to as the Millers Court victim rather than her actual name.Originally posted by packers stem View PostComment
-
This definitely rules out Kosminski.Comment
Comment