Why Not Her Hair?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by packers stem View PostYep....
That's why I refer to her as the Millers Court victim
Leave a comment:
-
I have a horrible suspicion that the reason that he never cut her hair could be..
hair doesn't bleed.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Riahsha View PostThe hair was needed to identify the victim though.
That's why I refer to her as the Millers Court victim
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostNot sure what a reproduction is supposed to prove?
Leave a comment:
-
lock of hair
I've often wondered how true this story, https://www.etsy.com/listing/1247053...-ripper-victim, is regarding George Payne and Edward Badham's grandson.
The item is a reproduction, but what of the story?
Leave a comment:
-
He did,it seems,use the Millers Court victim's hair to wipe his hands though
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pierre View PostHi,
Hair is not flesh.
Jack the Ripper was no hair dresser.
Cutting hair would have no shock effect.
Regards, Pierre
Chris
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by belinda View PostThis has always puzzled me, a lot.Why didn't Jack ,given the extensive mutilation to every part of her body,cut off her hair as well?
Hair is not flesh.
Jack the Ripper was no hair dresser.
Cutting hair would have no shock effect.
Regards, Pierre
Leave a comment:
-
Hair
I had always thought the hair was left intact so everyone would know, or assume, the woman in the room was in fact Mary Jane Kelly.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: