Thanks, Neil. I suspected that, if the letter was still around, it would have been published in one of the books.
But do you guys see the signatures that Chris provided a couple of posts above? When two people sign a document, you expect to see differences in their handwriting. Those are evident in the most recent example, but not (to my eye, anyway) in the original post.
I wonder if it's possible that Polly's husband was illiterate and so she signed the certificate for both of them? That might explain why, having just written "Nichols" once, she did it again, inadvertently, in her signature. Besides, at that point, her surname actually was Nichols, and she may have been confused about which name to use.
But do you guys see the signatures that Chris provided a couple of posts above? When two people sign a document, you expect to see differences in their handwriting. Those are evident in the most recent example, but not (to my eye, anyway) in the original post.
I wonder if it's possible that Polly's husband was illiterate and so she signed the certificate for both of them? That might explain why, having just written "Nichols" once, she did it again, inadvertently, in her signature. Besides, at that point, her surname actually was Nichols, and she may have been confused about which name to use.
Comment