Can any one clarify
Hi All,
I've been going through various newpaper reports on Nichols and came across an almost throw away remark in one of them.
I think it was the third session where LLewellyn was recalled and said that he had re examined the body and that no organs were missing.
I'm pretty sure it was before the Chapman murder.
Any ideas why at this point he would be checking on this?
I'll find the reference and post ASAP
ust found the reference (The Daily Telegraph, Tuesday, September 18, 1888, Page 2)
Dr. Llewellyn, recalled, said he had re-examined the body and there was no part of the viscera missing.
All the best
Dave
Hi All,
I've been going through various newpaper reports on Nichols and came across an almost throw away remark in one of them.
I think it was the third session where LLewellyn was recalled and said that he had re examined the body and that no organs were missing.
I'm pretty sure it was before the Chapman murder.
Any ideas why at this point he would be checking on this?
I'll find the reference and post ASAP
ust found the reference (The Daily Telegraph, Tuesday, September 18, 1888, Page 2)
Dr. Llewellyn, recalled, said he had re-examined the body and there was no part of the viscera missing.
All the best
Dave
Comment