Rob Clack found this. It contains the photos the sketches in the previous article were presumably taken from.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Annie Austin a Ripper Victim?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by seanr View Post
So we're supposed to believe a serial killer who murdered five women in the Whitechapel area with a random selection of victims, managed to select four women who lived close enough to one another, for their lodgings to be captured in a single photograph. Quite the coincidence. Almost unbelievable.
So the odds of each woman having slept in one of the pictured doss houses AT SOME TIME in their often many years on the streets, would surely not be all that high.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Azarna View Post
"Unfortunates" like the victims moved from doss house to doss house, quite frequently. And each doss house could sleep a lot of people at a time (far more than they were SUPPOSED to).
So the odds of each woman having slept in one of the pictured doss houses AT SOME TIME in their often many years on the streets, would surely not be all that high.
You are right. There were a handful of really dodgy streets in Spitalfields where the destitute congregated. Dorset Street was obviously one, Flower and Dean Street, Thrawl Street and George Street were similar and many of the WM victims had connections to those streets too.
Gary
- Likes 1
Comment
-
John McCarthy (b. Dieppe, France) is listed as a "Grocer" at 27 Dorset St. in the 1891 census. So is a younger brother, Daniel McCarthy, also at #27. They owned the business, but not the premises (John was likely the principal business owner). A third McCarthy at #27, also named John, was a "General Shop Keeper", born in Spitalfields. He was probably the one who ran the business, and likely collected the rents. Miller's Court was not a group of lodging houses like the well-to-do John McCarthy owned elsewhere in Dorset St. Miller's Court consisted of tenement housing (apartment rooms). This shop keeper John, I contend, was Mary Kelly's landlord and the one who appeared at her inquest, not the entrepreneurial fight-promoter and charity man and lodging house owner.
So there were a couple of business owners at #27, John McCarthy and Daniel, and a shop keeper/landlord named John McCarthy (who had a wife named Mary, and a son, George).
The shop keeper McCarthy ran the grocers from the ground floor of #27, a three-floor building, and probably lived above it. Rented rooms were behind the grocers shop in the court. The second and third floors wouldn't have had more than one or two rooms each. Where did the other McCarthys live?
This is three years after the Kelly murder, so may not reflect the census information in 1891. So why is the business owner, John McCarthy, his wife Elizabeth and their four (recorded at the time) children listed as residing at #27? Information was likely given to the enumerator by one of the other McCarthys that this McCarthy was the principal business owner, so the enumerator recorded the family as resident there.
Question: If someone as well-off as the John McCarthy who owned several lodging houses, and likely owned other businesses as well, could afford to live anywhere but on Dorest Street with his family, would he?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott Nelson View PostJohn McCarthy (b. Dieppe, France) is listed as a "Grocer" at 27 Dorset St. in the 1891 census. So is a younger brother, Daniel McCarthy, also at #27. They owned the business, but not the premises (John was likely the principal business owner). A third McCarthy at #27, also named John, was a "General Shop Keeper", born in Spitalfields. He was probably the one who ran the business, and likely collected the rents. Miller's Court was not a group of lodging houses like the well-to-do John McCarthy owned elsewhere in Dorset St. Miller's Court consisted of tenement housing (apartment rooms). This shop keeper John, I contend, was Mary Kelly's landlord and the one who appeared at her inquest, not the entrepreneurial fight-promoter and charity man and lodging house owner.
So there were a couple of business owners at #27, John McCarthy and Daniel, and a shop keeper/landlord named John McCarthy (who had a wife named Mary, and a son, George).
The shop keeper McCarthy ran the grocers from the ground floor of #27, a three-floor building, and probably lived above it. Rented rooms were behind the grocers shop in the court. The second and third floors wouldn't have had more than one or two rooms each. Where did the other McCarthys live?
This is three years after the Kelly murder, so may not reflect the census information in 1891. So why is the business owner, John McCarthy, his wife Elizabeth and their four (recorded at the time) children listed as residing at #27? Information was likely given to the enumerator by one of the other McCarthys that this McCarthy was the principal business owner, so the enumerator recorded the family as resident there.
Question: If someone as well-off as the John McCarthy who owned several lodging houses, and likely owned other businesses as well, could afford to live anywhere but on Dorest Street with his family, would he?
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
Hilarious!
Comment
-
>>McCarthy is notorious because his doubles are really brothels (in either Duckworth’s or Sergeant French’s opinion) and his common lodging houses are full of prostitutes, bullies, ponces and thieves.<<
Not to mention his organisation of illegal boxing matches and perhaps the gambling therein involved.dustymiller
aka drstrange
Comment
-
Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post>>McCarthy is notorious because his doubles are really brothels (in either Duckworth’s or Sergeant French’s opinion) and his common lodging houses are full of prostitutes, bullies, ponces and thieves.<<
Not to mention his organisation of illegal boxing matches and perhaps the gambling therein involved.
Comment
-
Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post>>McCarthy is notorious because his doubles are really brothels (in either Duckworth’s or Sergeant French’s opinion) and his common lodging houses are full of prostitutes, bullies, ponces and thieves.<<
Not to mention his organisation of illegal boxing matches and perhaps the gambling therein involved.
Tell me more.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Macdonald Triad View Post
How so? Don't make me make popcorn lol. I do appreciate your links, Barnett. And everyone contributing. I remember more this way. I'm still surprised by your soft words regarding Maher. "Minder." Babysitter with a gun and knife? We can quibble over McCarthy was a bully or not but I only arrived at my conclusion because of you. The boxing underworld of the East End is notorious. Again thanks to your info. Ching Ghook was very interesting but nothing like Guv'nor McCarthy.
Last edited by MrBarnett; 07-29-2022, 01:44 AM.
Comment
-
‘Double’ doss houses were often compared to brothels, but that wasn’t their primary function. The people who ran them didn’t care whether the couples who used them were legally married, in stable relationships, or enjoying one night stands with or without a financial incentive.Last edited by MrBarnett; 07-29-2022, 01:36 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
‘Matches’ plural?
Tell me more.
Sporting Life - Thursday 09 February 1899:
But maybe this was the other John McCarthy.Last edited by seanr; 07-29-2022, 07:47 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanr View Post
Henry Lee and Jack McCarthy will give their NINTH Grand Boxing Entertainment. Tickets to be obtained of Jack McCarthy, 27 Dorset Street, Spitalfields.
Sporting Life - Thursday 09 February 1899:
But maybe this was the other John McCarthy.Last edited by MrBarnett; 07-29-2022, 10:25 AM.
Comment
Comment