Hi Folks,
Just so you know Lynn Im not proposing the idea as anything more than discussion fodder, but in one fell swoop it would address the fact we can find no accurate history of Mary Jane Kelly to this day....(note that in response to your post DrHopper),...and why that body was so "over the top" mutilated.
The woman may well have been related to or known by important, controversial people and for the sake of anonymity and perhaps safety she used aliases. A good actress will always have a back story for her character.
The definitive identification of those remains in situ would be extremely difficult in my opinion, on both intellectual and emotional levels, and in situ, her eyes are not visible at all...one of only 2 features her ex live-in boyfriend could recognize.
Who would it be in that bed, who killed her and chopped her up, and how did they match or create the features Barnett would recognize as Marys?
Thats for discussion fodder. I havent figured those out.
Best regards,
Mike R
Just so you know Lynn Im not proposing the idea as anything more than discussion fodder, but in one fell swoop it would address the fact we can find no accurate history of Mary Jane Kelly to this day....(note that in response to your post DrHopper),...and why that body was so "over the top" mutilated.
The woman may well have been related to or known by important, controversial people and for the sake of anonymity and perhaps safety she used aliases. A good actress will always have a back story for her character.
The definitive identification of those remains in situ would be extremely difficult in my opinion, on both intellectual and emotional levels, and in situ, her eyes are not visible at all...one of only 2 features her ex live-in boyfriend could recognize.
Who would it be in that bed, who killed her and chopped her up, and how did they match or create the features Barnett would recognize as Marys?
Thats for discussion fodder. I havent figured those out.
Best regards,
Mike R
Comment