I see your "ships cook", but my impression is that these records have been jotted down at different time frames, perhaps even by different hospital personnel? Too tired right now to say if it's the same hand, but even in the scan it looks like different ink to me. Though it'd be better if I looked at it after a good night's sleep, lol.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Margaret Hames
Collapse
X
-
Contused Hip
Hi everyone.
I have to agree with Tom; I too see the word as singular, "hip", rather than the plural "hips". The letter "p" has a somewhat fainter or open top, making the next stroke appear to be an "s", but I don't think it is.
Enlarged images are attached. The page doesn't reproduce very clearly, but I think these images might help.
A contusion is an area of bruised tissue, so it can be caused by a fall, a blow, a bump, etc.
Best regards,
ArchaicLast edited by Archaic; 05-16-2012, 01:21 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostIt's the same entry, Maria, written by the same person at the same time.
Thanx to Bunny for posting the zoom in. I'm afraid I still see "hips", with an incomplete "p". What makes the case for me is the blank space before the "s", like if the person who was writing this briefly lifted their hand off the paper. Which would point to 2 different letters.Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostHi Debs, great find. I confess though that I don't see an 's' at the end of 'Hip'. I just see 'Hip'. It might just be my eyes, though. If it's just one hip, I'd call it a fall. If it's both hips, I'd think that a little weird.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
I still find it interesting that just a few months before she claims to have been attacked by some men and hopsitalised for a couple of weeks, she was also in the same hospital with an injury or injuries that kept her in hospital over 2 weeks. Maybe both were accidents in reality and she fabricated the story of being beaten after Emma claimed the same?Last edited by Debra A; 05-16-2012, 08:10 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Debra A View PostI still find it interesting that just a few months before she claims to have been attacked by some men and hopsitalised for a couple of weeks, she was also in the same hospital with an injury or injuries that kept her in hospital over 2 weeks. Maybe both were accidents in reality and she fabricated the story of being beaten after Emma claimed the same?
A bit hastily, cuz on my way to work.Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
One Hip
Originally posted by mariab View PostI kinda agree with your suspicion, Debs. Either she was VERY accident-prone ;-) or she might have been hanging out with an abusive pimp/clients. The fact that she might have tried to gain something out of the Emma Smith inquest doesn't necesserily mean that she was not injured and that she faked it, esp. with such long hospitalizations.
A bit hastily, cuz on my way to work.
There were some heavy snowfalls during mid-March 1887 as a low pressure pushed southwards in an Arctic airflow http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/archive/slp/1887/Rslp18870315.gif There was some exceptionally heavy snowfalls within the Bristol and SE Wales area on the 15th 22 inches at Clevedon 20...
regards, Bridewell.I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.
Comment
-
No one needs to be sorry. If it says hip, it says hip.
Margaret was still in the Infirmary twice in the space of 9 months whether its singular or plural! On the Dec occasion she claimed to have been assaulted by some men and had injuries to her face and chest, while earlier in March she had bruising to her hip. I've checked either side of 87 and haven't come across her in the records again so she wasn't as unlucky in other years as she was in 87.
Comment
-
What gets me is that the authorities didn't seem to have much if anything in place for these women when it came to food and shelter, but when it came to medical care, they seemed to have been well off. You could stub your toe and be given a bed and warm meals for weeks! I wonder if this wasn't an incentive for some of them. I also wonder if cocaine wasn't used in some of the medicinal potions that they handed out, such as that given to Annie Chapman. Also, where were they put up? Different places or was there one big ward? Sorry for all the questions, but these are some of the things I've been getting more curious about lately, and this thread set me off thinking about it all again.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Comment
-
I hope that noone (for their own sake) is buying it that that lady was accident-prone.
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostWhat gets me is that the authorities didn't seem to have much if anything in place for these women when it came to food and shelter, but when it came to medical care, they seemed to have been well off. You could stub your toe and be given a bed and warm meals for weeks! I wonder if this wasn't an incentive for some of them.
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostI also wonder if cocaine wasn't used in some of the medicinal potions that they handed out, such as that given to Annie Chapman.
PS.: Looked it up (but only on wiki) and cocaine was used as a cutting edge anesthetic in Germany/Austria, plus Coca Cola was apparently invented in 1885 in the US. Apart from Sherlock Holmes, I haven't seen any references about it in England.
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostAlso, where were they put up? Different places or was there one big ward? Sorry for all the questions, but these are some of the things I've been getting more curious about lately, and this thread set me off thinking about it all again.Last edited by mariab; 05-17-2012, 03:04 AM.Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
[QUOTE]Originally posted by mariab View PostI hope that noone (for their own sake) is buying it that that lady was accident-prone.
Wow, the use of cocaine is THAT old? You sure you don't mean morphine? Do you suspect that this is why the perp took her medicine?
PS.: Looked it up (but only on wiki) and cocaine was used as a cutting edge anesthetic in Germany/Austria, plus Coca Cola was apparently invented in 1885 in the US. Apart from Sherlock Holmes, I haven't seen any references about it in England.
TracyIt's not about what you know....it's about what you can find out
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostWhat gets me is that the authorities didn't seem to have much if anything in place for these women when it came to food and shelter, but when it came to medical care, they seemed to have been well off. You could stub your toe and be given a bed and warm meals for weeks! I wonder if this wasn't an incentive for some of them. I also wonder if cocaine wasn't used in some of the medicinal potions that they handed out, such as that given to Annie Chapman. Also, where were they put up? Different places or was there one big ward? Sorry for all the questions, but these are some of the things I've been getting more curious about lately, and this thread set me off thinking about it all again.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
The Whitechapel Union Infirmary was the place for sick paupers, the Whitechapel workhouse was the place for paupers with no shelter or food. Trouble was there were conditions applied for gaining free food and shelter in the workhouse-you had to pay back with physical work, stick to the strict rules of the workhouse and NO alcohol allowed! Which probably put more than a few people off going there, unless as a last resort.
I suspect the care at the Infirmary would have been quite basic but if you were on the streets in Winter and had severe bronchitis then it would be very sensible to head there as no conditions were imposed (obviously no alcohol again but no work payment was involved), if you were sick you were sick and you got treatment. It was an essential service for many people, just think how difficult things like giving birth would be if you were part of the lodging house population! My guess would be that the doctors, nurses and board of guardians would be very aware of potential misuse of the Infirmary and be keen to spot such cases and prevent it happening.
The Union infirmaries were the same as any other hospitals with doctors, nurses and different wards.
Cocaine? I bet they used it at the London Hospital or anywhere where surgery was done as I think one of its main uses at this time was as a local anesthetic?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cogidubnus View PostHi Debs
Hip or Hips something's still happened to her, and although it could be a fall, I suspect your Post #10 applies...I'm not trying to minimise it, but it seems it was something of an occupational hazard in that area at that time though.
Dave
I would bet that many of the women in the records claimed to have 'accidents' to explain their injuries (the majority probably domestic in nature) and no one would feel the need to persuade them otherwise or inform the police even if they had major suspicions and the woman's story didn't quite add up.
Comment
Comment