Besides, Liz is one of the canonical five
Greetings,
Addy
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Victim's simularities
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View Post"8 or 9. Can't be more."
Why can't it? 5 canonicals, Martha and Emma, Liz and Alice, 3 torsos. A few more?
LC
So 9 murders at best (worst) in my book :
Millwood, Smith, Tabram, Nichols, Chapman, Stride, Eddowes, Kelly, McKenzie.
Leave a comment:
-
Or perhaps a slightly darker skin which was mistaken for sunburn?
Greetings,
Addy
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Grave Maurice View PostThe sunburn description has always troubled me. I suspect that getting a sunburn in the latter part of 1888 in the East End would, for most people, be difficult. I read somewhere that sunburn might mean what we would now call a suntan and that makes more sense. Then it might describe anyone who worked outdoors most of the time, and could well include a sailor. Of course, if it simply means "flushed" then it might be used to describe a drinker, or someone with high blood pressure, or someone who was simply excited.
High blood pressure is a possibility, Rosacea, any number of skin afflictions.
Regards, Jon S.
Leave a comment:
-
The sunburn description has always troubled me. I suspect that getting a sunburn in the latter part of 1888 in the East End would, for most people, be difficult. I read somewhere that sunburn might mean what we would now call a suntan and that makes more sense. Then it might describe anyone who worked outdoors most of the time, and could well include a sailor. Of course, if it simply means "flushed" then it might be used to describe a drinker, or someone with high blood pressure, or someone who was simply excited.
Leave a comment:
-
Sugden?
Hello Malcolm.
"I don't think everyone thinks that JTR killed EXACTLY 5, because there are a few others that look a bit dodgy as well, maybe even Tabram too... not sure."
Malcolm, is that you or Phillip Sugden speaking?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
proliferation
Hello David.
"8 or 9. Can't be more."
Why can't it? 5 canonicals, Martha and Emma, Liz and Alice, 3 torsos. A few more?
"One can also treat each case individually and come to the conclusion that there was a serial killer in the East End 1888."
I believe that possible. But do you know of any researcher who has actually done this? Honestly, I always ASSUMED one hand did it all.
"You're right, Lynn. "Exactly 5" is a bias (a documented bias, I mean, ie : Macnaghten), it has to be well understood."
I think I understand it; can't say I agree with it.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Malcolm. Why must I accept that? I believed it for many years. It doesn't work.
I understand the blokes who have one lad killing 10-12 women; I also understand those who say treat each case individually. But hard to understand those who, on account of Bond and MacNaughten, see EXACTLY 5 ladies killed by one hand. It's VERY artificial.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View PostNor would I, Wickerman. I hadn't really looked at this before. "Not a world away from" later descriptions? It's pretty much bang on apart from the "face sunburnt" aspect, but sunburn would have faded by the time of the later murders.
Very interesting.
Sure, you can't rule out a sailor recently arrived from overseas, but there has always been a traditional rumor connected with the Whitechapel Murders that the killer had contracted syphilis.
This patient presented with a dermatologic condition, which proved to be a manifestation of a secondary syphilitic infection.
Secondary syphilis is the most contagious of all stages this disease, and is characterized by the spread of the Treponema pallidum bacteria throughout the body, causing systemic symptoms including cutaneous rashes such as the one depicted in this photograph.
This type of rash gives the skin a red hue similar to sunburn.
Regards, Jon S.
Leave a comment:
-
I understand the blokes who have one lad killing 10-12 women
I also understand those who say treat each case individually
But hard to understand those who, on account of Bond and MacNaughten, see EXACTLY 5 ladies killed by one hand. It's VERY artificial.
Leave a comment:
-
views
Hello Malcolm. Why must I accept that? I believed it for many years. It doesn't work.
I understand the blokes who have one lad killing 10-12 women; I also understand those who say treat each case individually. But hard to understand those who, on account of Bond and MacNaughten, see EXACTLY 5 ladies killed by one hand. It's VERY artificial.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: