Although I doubt that Smith was actually attacked by a gang, that doesn't preclude the possibility that she was and that the perpetrator of the mortal wound was Jack as a member of that band. He would not be the only serial killer to commit his first murder as part of a gang before striking out on his own.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is the most Canonial non-Canonical? POLL
Collapse
X
-
Hi DVV,
Originally posted by DVV View Postbut we know she lied to Mary Russell and Annie Lee by omission.
Wikipedia about 'lying by omission' : One lies by omission by omitting an important fact, deliberately leaving another person with a misconception.
Best Regards,
Ditlew
Comment
-
Originally posted by ditlew View PostHow do we know that?
Ditlew
Check the Sourcebook, p 5:
"Smith, who seemed unwilling to go into details, did not describe the men nor give any further account of the occurrence to witness [Mary Russell]."
She actually gave more details to the doctor.
Worth giving it a thought, no ?
Amitiés,
David
Comment
-
Ance once again, she was recorded as a married woman, working as a charwoman.
Which is neither an indication, nor an evidence, but a proof that Smith and/or her friend(s) have hided to the hospital the fact that she was a widow supporting herself by prostitution.
Perhaps Sox, who said Smith didn't lie and had no reason to do so, will provide us with an unknown Hospital document registering Smith as an infortunate widow.
Amitiés,
DavidLast edited by DVV; 01-19-2010, 12:12 AM.
Comment
-
Hi DVV,
Originally posted by DVV View PostShe actually gave more details to the doctor.
I have been a witness myself to a crime, and I for one can tell you that the first statement I made to those arround me was quite shorter and less detailed than the one I gave the police, once I had had a chance to settle down. We know notthing about her lying in omission. It is pure speculation and not even a good one if I may say so.
Best Regards,
Ditlew
Comment
-
DVV,
Originally posted by DVV View PostAnce once again, she was recorded as a married woman, working as a charwoman.
Which is neither an indication, nor an evidence, but a proof that Smith and/or her friend(s) have hided to the hospital the fact that she was a widow supporting herself by prostitution.
Best Regards,
Ditlew
Comment
-
Originally posted by ditlew View PostAnd THAT is how you conclude that she was lying in omission?! Could she e.g. just have been in extreme pain and just wanted to be left alone?? Ditlew
Is it more painful to articulate "widow" than "married woman" ?
Would they have asked her details about her sad fall into prostitution before taking care of her health ?
Amitiés,
David
Comment
-
Wasn't it stated somewhere (can't remember where, maybe someone more in the know can tell) that the spot where Emma claimed she was attacked had a police officer on the spot or something along those lines, at the time Emma claimed the attack took place? It was either a P.C or maybe a watchman or something.Best regards,
Adam
"They assumed Kelly was the last... they assumed wrong" - Me
Comment
-
DVV,
Originally posted by DVV View PostStrange argument...
Is it more painful to articulate "widow" than "married woman" ?
Would they have asked her details about her sad fall into prostitution before taking care of her health ?
Best Regards,
Ditlew
Comment
-
Originally posted by ditlew View Post
You misquote me and hence are lying? The remark you quote were regarding her talk with the women NOT the doctor, come on.
Ditlew
Amitiés,
David
Comment
-
Originally posted by ditlew View PostDVV,
.. plus as you have just pointed out yourself, we don't know who inlisted her. It might have been her friends.
Best Regards,
Ditlew
Mary Russell was a deputy lodger, whose lodging house was used by prostitutes.
Both Emma's story and the Hospital records (informed by Emma and/or Mary) hide the fact that she was a prostitute.
What can I say more ?
Amitiés,
David
Comment
-
DVV,
Originally posted by DVV View PostIndeed, that was the very point. She "omitted" more facts to her friends...that's a fact. And it answers your objection. As you well understand, since I'm of opinion she lied, it makes no difference to me.
What Emma did was something completely different, and one can only claim that she was lying by speculating about what took place and what her motivations was.
Best Regards,
Ditlew
Comment
Comment