Originally posted by Ally
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Victim Conversation (off-topic moved)
Collapse
X
-
Ally, you talk of 'abandoned' children all the time.
I believe these children would have been removed by the parish authorities because of the parent's behaviour... and the resentment would have been the same, whether they had been abandoned or removed.
You can't resolve family issues with matters of law.
All of the men we discuss here, in close relationship with the victims, would have denied such a close relationship when questioned by the authorities simply because they would have been prosecuted if they admitted that they were living on the immoral earnings of their partners.
This is absolutely crucial to our meagre understanding of the complicated situation.
But I have to say that your stance and attitude here is not helpful to further study.
Comment
-
Yeah my stance and attitude that requires looking at the actual facts and not making up fantasies is really not conducive to the fantasy world you want to build, I can completely see that.
I could argue further but it's useless to argue with people who live in total la la land and apparently can construct elaborate fantasies where Annie and Polly didn't abandon their children long before they became prostitutes but it's okay that they abandoned their children because the authorities would have taken them anyway...okay. Yeah. Sure. That's an argument dripping with reason.
Da Horse is Dead and Done.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
Comment
-
Hi Halomanuk
Behind this playground argument is a very serious argument indeed. Serious allegations were made against one of the worlds most respected Ripperologists.
And another Ripper myth was being sold to the greater public. That the victims of Jack the Ripper were ‘bad mothers’.
As has been demonstrated there is NO evidence for this. What these woman had in common were two things. They were Prostitutes and they drank (to various degrees)
What quite clearly has Not been demonstrated is that these women were in any way bad mothers (and lets face it only the children really have the right to reach that conclusion) and that Neal Sheldons reputation as one of the greatest authorities on the Ripper case is still intact.
It’s been an educating evening all round, nearly as good as last night except in less esteemed company.
Pirate
Comment
-
Welcome to the world, Ally:
Chapman:
'Known as "Dark Annie," she was a 47-year old destitute prostitute who roamed the streets and moved from one common lodging house to the next when she could afford to pay for a room. In the early a.m. hours of September 8, 1888 she was thrown out of her lodging house to earn money for her bed. Her body was found several hours later in the backyard of 29 Hanbury Street disemboweled and mutilated. Her uterus and a portion of the flesh surrounding her belly button were taken from the scene by the killer. She had married John Chapman, a coachman, in 1869. The couple had three children but her firstborn died of meningitis and her youngest son was born crippled. Due probably to the stress caused by the misfortunes of their children, the couple took to heavy drinking and separated. They lived apart for four years during which time Annie received an allowance from her husband until his death in 1886. '
Comment
-
Originally posted by c.d. View PostCause you da man, Tom!!!
"If you want to be the man, you got to beat the man." Woooooooo
Nature Boy Ric Flair
c.d.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
P.S. Natalie...you're a day late and a dollar short!
Comment
-
"Due Probably". Boy there's facts. So it's wrong to speculate on causation if it paints them in a negative light, but it's okay to speculate on causes if it paints them in a pathetic and sympathetic light.
None of those facts are new to me and the speculation as to why they started drinking doesn't interest me. Frankly, I don't care why people do what they do. What matters is what you do. And there is no excuse on the planet good enough for abandoning your living children. And saying that because one child dies it's an excuse to ditch the living who still need you is warped.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by halomanuk View PostHi Pirate,
If an allegation against a ripper author is being made then fair enough..Last edited by Ally; 06-05-2009, 11:30 PM.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ally View Post"Due Probably". Boy there's facts. So it's wrong to speculate on causation if it paints them in a negative light, but it's okay to speculate on causes if it paints them in a pathetic and sympathetic light.
None of those facts are new to me and the speculation as to why they started drinking doesn't interest me. Frankly, I don't care why people do what they do. What matters is what you do. And there is no excuse on the planet good enough for abandoning your living children. And saying that because one child dies it's an excuse to ditch the living who still need you is warped.
Did the behaviour of Tom Conway,for example, have anything to do with Kate fleeing the domestic violence she was subjected to which could easily have resulted in an even more premature death?
Might the behaviour of Polly"s unfaithfull husband,when she was giving birth to their fifth child, have contributed to her leaving him?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Natalie Severn View PostPirate Jack,
I would like to know what you mean by saying you are in "less esteemed company"?
Why do you have to constantly rake up some kind of "pecking order"?
Its so uncool that kind of crap hierarchy talk all the time.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostWooooo Hooooooooo! You tell 'em, C.D. I guess maybe I should give Pirate Jack some credit for knowing how to pick his sparing partners, then.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
P.S. Natalie...you're a day late and a dollar short!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Natalie Severn View PostDid the behaviour of Tom Conway,for example, have anything to do with Kate fleeing the domestic violence she was subjected to which could easily have resulted in an even more premature death?
Might the behaviour of Polly"s unfaithfull husband,when she was giving birth to their fifth child, have contributed to her leaving him?
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
Comment
Comment