to stop one of the victims from being killed and to catch jack the ripper, which victim would you choose and why?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If you could go back in time
Collapse
X
-
I would visit early so I could see an East End Summer, perhaps paddle in the Thames!
It is alleged that Robert D'Onston Stephenson had a bolthole on Leman Street, even though he was in hospital, so we could be roommates, or I could watch him.
I would leave after or on Boxing Day, as we know Stephenson went to visit Inspector Roots on Christmas Eve.
By visiting the east end between these two dates, I get to see Tabram and the C5, the investigation, mania, and maybe a ripper letter, and get to have a Victorian Christmas!
The family are great thanks, Bradley has gone to school!Regards Mike
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Covell View PostBradley is fine thanks.
Of course I would love to see who carried out such crimes, but what then?
So, here we are.
Comment
-
I would save all the victims(Who I think are Martha,Polly,Annie,Catherine and Mary)and give them a great life in the present free from all the poverty and sadness of their life. I am sorry I can not pick one victim to save. Or I could just go back in time and kill Jack - the no one would need saving.Last edited by CLK; 03-09-2009, 06:41 PM.CLK
Comment
-
Wrong. You would need saving because you just took the law into your own hands.
I have fantasized about this in the past. How would you convince Abberline etal. that you knew who and when the next one would be? First you would be ignored as a nut and then when the next one happened just as you said it would you would be hunted down as an accomplice or even accused of being Jack yourself.
Comment
-
History should not be changed. It is good to imagine it sometimes but you should not rewrite the rules. I have come to the decision that I would save none of the victims but I would like to know who Jack was. But we do not know who he is and I can not find out because it would change history, whether I told anyone else or not.CLK
Comment
-
Originally posted by CLK View PostHistory should not be changed. It is good to imagine it sometimes but you should not rewrite the rules. I have come to the decision that I would save none of the victims but I would like to know who Jack was. But we do not know who he is and I can not find out because it would change history, whether I told anyone else or not.
As hard as it would be to save none of them (and it would be very hard for me), I would instead simply take a camera and a lot of film. I would do what I could to make sure that we had photos of every single one of the ladies in life -- and Inspector Abberline, too. Maybe a few other people. And definitely of many, many places -- there are a lot of places in London that I can think of, that I've never seen a Victorian-era photo of, or that the photos we do seem to have are not quite at the angle I wish they were. (Like, a good picture of the Britannia, or of the Ten Bells -- ones specifically of those buildings, rather than ones where they are just in the distance.)
Then I'd see if a nice Victorian horse or two would fit in the time machine to bring home.~ Khanada
I laugh in the face of danger. Then I run and hide until it goes away.
Comment
-
Saving any one of the victims might invalidate the reason for travelling back in time in the first place - so you'd never end up going. Just one of those paradoxes time-travellers like me have to deal with on a millennium-by-millennium basis.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
Comment