I think c.d. is correct in that its reasonable to assume that the police must have asked Kidney for an alibi. But does Kidney come across to others as a drunken idiot not worthy of consideration. Have the police made a mistake in assuming that the so called serial killer JTR has killed Stride and disregarded Kidney as a viable offender. The inquest summing up tends to squash any ideas that it is somebody else who could have killed Stride but Kidney clearly lies at the inquest when another witness says that Stride had recently departed from Kidney after having had 'words' or something similar indicating a row and he seems to be agitated about her taking some items. I am not saying Kidney is responsible but there are some factors here that make him stand out a bit more than others. Also what's all the shouting about by Kidney at the police station on the evening of 1st Oct saying he can catch the ripper. Sounds to me like someone trying to distract the police's attention in the direction of JTR. Very odd I think.
NW
NW
Comment