Originally posted by Tom_Wescott
View Post
But according to the casebook victims' archive, in the pocket of Stride's underskirt were found:
A key (as of a padlock)
A small piece of lead pencil
Six large and one small button
A comb
A broken piece of comb
A metal spoon
A hook (as from a dress)
A piece of muslin
One or two small pieces of paper
Are you suggesting that the assailant only asked her to empty some of her pockets? Victorian men would have been wise about Victorian womens' (under)garments and the possibility of underskirts pockets etc..
On the other side, I completely agree with Chapman's ring intendations signaling a robbery pre-mortem. With Eddowes possibly too, since his hands would have been bloody for a search in her pockets postmortem, and some items in her pockets were apparently found blood-free. But this doesn't necessarily mean that the Ripper used the exact same MO on every single victim. He would have been able to adapt to situations. It might very well be that Stride was nibbling on cachous when her assailant approached her.
PS.: Cris, do you have details/a press report on that case where there was a struggle and the body was still holding items in her hands postmortem?
Leave a comment: