Arbeter Fraint's Take

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Simon Wood
    Commissioner
    • Feb 2008
    • 5552

    #121
    Hi Observer,

    Scotland Yard employed dozens of translators.

    LVP Britain was the [ever so discreet] vigilant state.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

    Comment

    • Robert
      Commissioner
      • Feb 2008
      • 5163

      #122
      I'm surprised there is no mention of the club women going outside to see if they could do anything, or at least provide a female presence. The idea of women staying indoors while the men take charge of the dead body of one of their co-genders seems really odd to me.

      Comment

      • Cogidubnus
        Assistant Commissioner
        • Feb 2012
        • 3266

        #123
        Oh dear

        "Well if one were up the yard, watching from the door, one would be an undisclosed witness, wouldn't one?'

        Indeed. And my private opinion is that is what happened. And if an Anarcho-Socialist had come forward, it would have entailed difficulties.
        what unsettles me is that Gilyarovsky seems to have known too much too soon.

        does it seem like that to anyone else?

        How could he have seen blood? It seems that Dimshits had lit just the one match and that Gilyarovsky went to tell people without ever seeing the body.

        Any thoughts on his too-early knowledge -- not just that she was dead, but that there was blood?
        Looks like the makings of a good conspiracy theory here...the jewish/socialist/anarchist witness who didn't come forward!


        Dave
        Last edited by Cogidubnus; 03-21-2012, 01:13 AM. Reason: small typo correction

        Comment

        • Cogidubnus
          Assistant Commissioner
          • Feb 2012
          • 3266

          #124
          Alternative

          Or is it "Oh bless thee Schwartz, bless thee, thou art translated?"

          Dave

          Comment

          • lynn cates
            Commisioner
            • Aug 2009
            • 13841

            #125
            What's in a name?

            Hello Dave. Funny, that's my wife's name for me.

            Cheers.
            LC

            Comment

            • lynn cates
              Commisioner
              • Aug 2009
              • 13841

              #126
              mum

              Hello (again) Dave. No, no conspiracy here. But many good reasons to shut up IF you did see something.

              Cheers.
              LC

              Comment

              • Cogidubnus
                Assistant Commissioner
                • Feb 2012
                • 3266

                #127
                But many good reasons to shut up IF you did see something.
                ...until perhaps the police catch on, and with some difficulty, confront you with another Jew as a suspect perhaps?

                Dave

                Comment

                • Cogidubnus
                  Assistant Commissioner
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 3266

                  #128
                  And when Kozebrodsky, (presumably alias Gilyarovsky), was arrested during a punch up at the club in March 1889 and convicted of assaulting a policeman, why was he 'recommended to mercy' - and when ordered to pay a fine of £4 or face one month's imprisonment, which did he select, and did the month inside include an illicit trip to the Seaside?

                  Just letting the thoughts turn over idly, as one does....

                  Dave

                  Comment

                  • Observer
                    Assistant Commissioner
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 3177

                    #129
                    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
                    Hi Observer,

                    Scotland Yard employed dozens of translators.

                    LVP Britain was the [ever so discreet] vigilant state.

                    Regards,

                    Simon
                    Hi Simon

                    Thanks for that, I gathered as much. Vigilant state indeed, and that is why I consider it unlikely that any clandestine group were ever guilty of the Whitechapel murders .

                    How about Arbeter Fraint though, do you think it was worthy of a translation?

                    Regards

                    Observer

                    Comment

                    • Wickerman
                      Commissioner
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 14865

                      #130
                      Originally posted by mariab View Post
                      Fresh, semi-clotted blood would run from her wrist to her palm/fingers.
                      Semi-clotted blood does run anywhere. Once the blood comes in contact with oxygen it begins to thicken, and stops running.
                      In fact clotted blood doesn't mean lumps of blood (someone thinks this was the grapes?).
                      When blood clots it just goes thick, so the blood stains on the 'back' & 'wrist' of Strides right hand was just that, smears of blood. No blood noted in the palm of her hand, presumably where the grapes would have been seen.
                      So, clotted blood does not equal grapes, there was no blood in her hand.

                      Originally posted by mariab View Post
                      The important thing is to explain the "grapes" here, since we know for a fact that they never existed.
                      That should be no trouble Maria, just label them liars. Thats the usual tactic employed when a detail must be dismissed because it doesn't fit the paradigm.

                      Anyhow, the article is still of interest even though it does not refer to a Schwartz-type escapade. And, neither does it mention the Echo/Scotsman story, supposedly offered by Wess, the Secretary.
                      All together a little odd.

                      Regards, Jon S.
                      Regards, Jon S.

                      Comment

                      • curious
                        Chief Inspector
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 1572

                        #131
                        Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                        Hello (again) Dave. No, no conspiracy here. But many good reasons to shut up IF you did see something.

                        Cheers.
                        LC
                        Or perhaps if you had done something . . .

                        Comment

                        • mariab
                          Superintendent
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 2977

                          #132
                          Originally posted by Monty View Post
                          Maria,
                          You asked me about who was incharge of the scene at Berner Street.
                          Chief Inspector West would have been the rank taking control along with Inspector Pinchorn. Inspector Reid, CID, was late on the scene having heard of Strides death at 1.25am. Yes, both would be plain clothed.
                          I must concede, if any of the murder sites would attract SB attention then it would have been Berner Street. And their movements would have been more covert than overt obviously. Theres a few clues in the inquest testimony and reports which could be taken as an alluding to Special Branch involvement though the wording in Lynns wonderful transcription could, in my opinion, still be taken as CID.
                          Thank you so much Monty. I'll come back to you about this and about the WVC (in due time). Plus inspector Arnold too was documentedly there, right?
                          Monty, any ideas of who would have been in charge of investigations pertaining to William Wess' cigar contraband? A Victorian equivalent of ATF? :-)
                          And I'll definitely have a look in Spiro Demolianis chapter of his book about the SB.

                          Originally posted by Observer View Post
                          Also, If the police were as interested in the IWEC as some poster's would have us believe, would they have had translations of the paper carried out for their own perusal?
                          If the police had translated the AF, I wish we'd stumble upon those translations, so that Lynn wouldn't be required to open his wallet and I wouldn't be going through a Yiddish alphabet soup in search of specific words sitting on the floor under a lamp. Lol.
                          Seriously now Observer, this is a question I've asked myself, and what I can tell you is that the French secret police doesn't appear to have used translations of the AF, at least they don't mention anything about translating the paper, though there's mention of confiscating the paper in their reports. The AF also circulated in Paris. French secret police appears to have proceeded the old fashioned way, meddling with the anarchists and keeping their ears pricked up. On the other side, it appears that the AF avoided announcing scheduled anarchist meetings (which we know they took place from the police reports), so maybe the London police was monitoring the newspaper. So far the only documentation we have is from the FRENCH secret police (located by me during my search on anarchists in Paris at the Archives Nationales and in the Archives of the Paris Police Museum), and I have no idea if anyone has ever attempted looking for similar police reports in London. Maybe someone should?

                          Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
                          Anyhow, the article is still of interest even though it does not refer to a Schwartz-type escapade. And, neither does it mention the Echo/Scotsman story, supposedly offered by Wess, the Secretary.
                          Or BECAUSE it does not refer to a Schwartz-type escapade. Wickerman, just READ the Echo/Scotsman report. It QUOTES Wess for goodness frickin' sake. You're something else.
                          Best regards,
                          Maria

                          Comment

                          • Wickerman
                            Commissioner
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 14865

                            #133
                            Originally posted by mariab View Post
                            Wickerman, just READ the Echo/Scotsman report. It QUOTES Wess for goodness frickin' sake. You're something else.
                            Like "I" said, the story was "supposedly" offered by Wess. He is "not" quoted (I'm assuming you know the difference between a quote and a reference?).

                            The Secretary (Wess) is given as the source, but not quoted anywhere.
                            Assuming Wess was the source, the story is at best second hand because Wess, by his own admission, had left the club at 12:15 am.

                            Therefore, the Echo only had a second-hand source. So, why didn't they track down the originator of the story?, because we know it wasn't Wess.

                            The fact this AF article makes no inference to this "chase along Fairclough St." only casts more doubt on the viability of the Echo story as a whole.

                            Regards, Jon S.
                            Regards, Jon S.

                            Comment

                            • mariab
                              Superintendent
                              • Jun 2010
                              • 2977

                              #134
                              There's no "supposedly" here. This is the IWEC secretary speaking, AKA William Wess. Referencing an entirely non viable story to cover his Club's a$$.
                              Last edited by mariab; 03-21-2012, 06:12 AM.
                              Best regards,
                              Maria

                              Comment

                              • Tom_Wescott
                                Commissioner
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 6996

                                #135
                                Debs and Schwartz

                                I'm going to try to ignore the more non-sensical posts on this thread, but there have been many good comments and questions I'd like to take a stab at.

                                Debs,

                                The Echo report, which was an interview with William Wess, offers a garbled version of the Schwartz story, and there can be little doubt that the Schwartz episode is the inspiration for the story. I believe the characters were twisted by the reporter, but it's possible it was Wess. Considering that the club had only about 15 'members' but many times that in attendees, Wess would have been telling the truth, perhaps with a wink, when he said that the man (Schwartz) was not a member of his club. But since Wess, an integral member of the club, was aware of the Schwartz incident prior to publication of this Arbeter Fraint edition, it's natural that Lynn would be looking for Schwartz in the journal, as was I. Only unlike Lynn, I'm not surprised to find no mention of him.

                                Yours truly,

                                Tom Wescott

                                Edit: Just to be clear, my first sentence regarding nonsense does not refer to anything Debs has written. I realized upon re-reading that I may have inadvertently left the wrong impression.
                                Last edited by Tom_Wescott; 03-21-2012, 07:00 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X