If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
"The horse shied to the right? Don't they mean left?"
Well, if one were up the yard, watching from the door or printing office, it would be correct.
Cheers.
LC
Well if one were up the yard, watching from the door, one would be an undisclosed witness, wouldn't one? And if the door were open, presumably the scene would be better lit than we've been led to believe!
Do not lose sight of the fact that at the time there was a deliberate blurring of the activities between the CID and those of the variously-titled 'Special Branch', 'Section D', 'Special Confidential Section', 'Special (Secret) Branch', and 'Home Office, Crime Department, Special Branch'.
"For the purposes of administration these men had to be members of the CID 'and not be ostensibly distinguished from other Constables [sic] of that Force'; but they were financed (secretly) out of Imperial and not Metropolitan Police funds." Bernard Porter, The Origins of the Vigilant State, 1987.
By the way, Superintendent Arnold also turned up in Berner Street.
Regards,
Simon
PS. Happy birthday to a fellow Piscean.
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
Well if one were up the yard, watching from the door, one would be an undisclosed witness, wouldn't one? And if the door were open, presumably the scene would be better lit than we've been led to believe!
Dave
You beat me to it Dave.
There was no one present at the door as Diemschutz entered the yard, witness testimony reveals this fact. Diemschutz discovered the body, and as he pulled his pony into the yard he would have had to have pulled to the left of the body. I'm sure this is what he related to the police.
The Arbeiter Fraint seems to be in error regarding this fact.
He immediately struck a match, but that was insufficient and he wasn’t able to get a [good] flame, he was nevertheless able by the light of the first match to see that the object was a woman. From excitement he jumped off the cart, ran through the back door into the club and raised an alarm. Immediately Comrade Gilyarovsky ran into the printing shop and editor’s office that are located in the same building as the club, but separated in the back by the yard.
There was no one in the printing shop. Comrades Krants and Yaffa were busy in the editor’s office.
“Don’t you know that a murdered woman is lying in the yard?” Gilyarovsky breathlessly called out. At first the two comrades did not want to believe him. “What, don’t you believe me?” Gilyarovsky quickly asked: “I saw blood.”
Yaffa and Krants immediately ran out and went over to the gate. The gate was open and it was very dark near the gate. A black object was barely discernable near the brick building. Once they got very close, they could notice that it was the shape of a woman that was lying with its face to the wall, with its head toward the yard and with its feet pointing to the gate. Comrades Morris Eygel, Fridenthal and Gilyarovsky were standing around the body. Eygel struck a match and shouted to the figure lying there: “Get up!” “Why are you waking her?” asked Yaffa, who noticed that the woman was lying in a liquid. “Don’t you see that the woman is dead?”
Hi, Lynn,
Great information. Thanks for making this happen.
what unsettles me is that Gilyarovsky seems to have known too much too soon.
does it seem like that to anyone else?
How could he have seen blood? It seems that Dimshits had lit just the one match and that Gilyarovsky went to tell people without ever seeing the body.
Any thoughts on his too-early knowledge -- not just that she was dead, but that there was blood?
Do not lose sight of the fact that at the time there was a deliberate blurring of the activities between the CID and those of the variously-titled 'Special Branch', 'Section D', 'Special Confidential Section', 'Special (Secret) Branch', and 'Home Office, Crime Department, Special Branch'.
"For the purposes of administration these men had to be members of the CID 'and not be ostensibly distinguished from other Constables [sic] of that Force'; but they were financed (secretly) out of Imperial and not Metropolitan Police funds." Bernard Porter, The Origins of the Vigilant State, 1987.
By the way, Superintendent Arnold also turned up in Berner Street.
Regards,
Simon
PS. Happy birthday to a fellow Piscean.
Hi Simon,
What do you mean 'was'? Still is.
Yes, you make a valid point. I must concede, if any of the murder sites would attract SB attention then it would have been Berner Street. And their movements would have been more covert than overt obviously.
Theres a few clues in the inquest testimony and reports which could be taken as an alluding to Special Branch involvement though the wording in Lynns wonderful transcription could, in my opinion, still be taken as CID.
However thats just my opinion, nothing more.
And thank you for the Birthday wishes, the same to you.
I would still remind everyone that this IS a press report and as such it should not be considered an authority over more reliable sources (police reports, etc) simply because it emanated from the newspaper printed on the premises of the murder. The men of the Arbeter Fraint made no bones that their paper was first and foremost a propaganda tool biased towards their cause and anything they publish must be accepted with that in mind.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Common sense prevails.
Also, If the police were as interested in the IWEC as some poster's would have us believe, would they have had translations of the paper carried out for their own perusal ?
Comment