If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
To Lynn and Tom:
I agree with Tom on this, Lynn. Stride might have worked on Fashion Street AND pretended she lived there as well, to give the impression of a better social situation. It's a trick used by teenagers in many movies, if any of you has ever seen Fame or Pretty in pink, etc.. (Where a person walks up to a “fancy“, rich-looking building and pretends to search for their keys, until the person to be fooled leaves the premises.)
To Abby Normal:
Hello Aby,
I very much agree with you in a scenario where the Ripper was pretending to be a well-off john, offering “unfortunates“ goodies such as bonnets, flowers, cachous (perhaps even grapes? probably not, Tom!!). But I don't think that Stride would have needed too much persuasion or drink to have accepted to offer her favours to any man willing to pay the standard fee – her financial situation was deplorable, and she had just left the residence she shared with Kidney. Nor do I believe that any “affection“ for Kidney might have brought up any hesitation. She was used to prostituting herself during her entire relationship with Kidney. She knew it was either that, or begging at the different Swedish churches (as she also did), or starve (which she probably had also experienced in depth).
According to more experienced Ripperologists, the woman who said “Not tonight, some other night“ was apparently someone else than Stride. – Can you corroborate this, please, Fisherman? About the other couple on the streets that night? It's you who brought my attention upon this (on another thread).
As for "You would say anything but your prayers.", in my opinion this was pronounced at the initial state of the encounter. It's a seemingly benign, flirtatious joke, hiding a lot of hostility and rage inside, and it totally could have been declared by the Ripper himself. (In my opinion.)
Hi Maria
"I very much agree with you in a scenario where the Ripper was pretending to be a well-off john, offering “unfortunates“ goodies such as bonnets, flowers, cachous"
I don't think he neccessarily needed to even pretend. i think he probably was better well-off then his victims, at least a little anyway. But i don't necessarily disagree, he might have- to make him self more attractive as a john to them.
But I don't think that Stride would have needed too much persuasion or drink to have accepted to offer her favours to any man willing to pay the standard fee – her financial situation was deplorable, and she had just left the residence she shared with Kidney. Nor do I believe that any “affection“ for Kidney might have brought up any hesitation. She was used to prostituting herself during her entire relationship with Kidney. She knew it was either that, or begging at the different Swedish churches (as she also did), or starve (which she probably had also experienced in depth).
OK-you've won me over on those points, but perhaps then her fear of the WC murderer was her only reason for the reluctance. Or perhaps she sensed that this person was a potential new boyfriend and she did not want to give away the fact that she was just a prostitute to him. I think whatever the reason, there was reluctance on Strides to go straight to the alley for a quicky job.
According to more experienced Ripperologists, the woman who said “Not tonight, some other night“ was apparently someone else than Stride. – Can you corroborate this, please, Fisherman? About the other couple on the streets that night? It's you who brought my attention upon this (on another thread).
I don't think that its conclusive that James Brown saw/heard someone else other than Stride.
It's a seemingly benign, flirtatious joke, hiding a lot of hostility and rage inside, and it totally could have been declared by the Ripper himself. (In my opinion.)
Thank you so much for all the info, Fisherman. So WHY on earth would Stride have lied about Fashion Street, then? I think that Tom Wescott in his Examiner 1 piece came up with the explanation that she was trying to sell herself as better off than she truly was. Tom, can you help us out here? Explanation required?!
By the way, Fisherman, while reading the articles posted on casebook about Victorian Whitechapel, I was very surprised to find out that the Whitechapel people at the markets very much dug singing La Marseillaise and another “tune“ from a politicized French opera called La Muette de Portici (The mute girl from Portici), which was a HUGE success in the early 19th century. A production of this opera in 1830 Brussels helped start the Belgian insurrection, which eventually led to Belgium's independence from the Dutch. The “tune“ in question is the refrain of a duet, called “Mieux vaut mourir que rester miserable“ (“Better to die than to remain a miserable slave“), and it very much ressembles the Marseillaise. I find it so cool that the Whitechapel people were sensitive to this!
By the by, it's flat as a pancake here as the swell report goes at J-Bay, and I've slept for 11 hours (with interruptions)!! Cheetahs sleep for 16-18 hours a day, to conserve energy. With the exception of Choby, my cheetah-specied love-interest, who never sleeps, he's too wired for that...
"what Lawende might have seen was JtR (BS man) ... Thoughts?"
Just the one: Lawendes man was described as a shabby looking guy, whereas the Star report tells us that Schwartz described BS as a respectabel looking man. And if BS and Marshalls man are one and the same, then he gave the appearance of a clerk, whereas Lawendes guy had a distinct sailorlike appearance.
The best,
Fisherman
Hi Fisherking
Thanks for the response.
As GM said there are/were clerks in the navy. Also, I have my doubts about Lawende seeing JtR and Eddowes-he could have seen a different couple while the real couple was already in the alley.
I beleive he is the only witness to describe a blonde man plus he never identified stride as the woman?
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Thank you so much for all the info, Fisherman. So WHY on earth would Stride have lied about Fashion Street, then? I think that Tom Wescott in his Examiner 1 piece came up with the explanation that she was trying to sell herself as better off than she truly was. Tom, can you help us out here? Explanation required?!
By the way, Fisherman, while reading the articles posted on casebook about Victorian Whitechapel, I was very surpised to find out that the Whitechapel people at the markets very much dug singing La Marseillaise and another tune from a politicized French opera called La Muette de Portici (The mute girl from Portici), which was a HUGE success in the early 19th century. A production of this opera in 1830 Brussels helped start the Belgian insurrection, which eventually led to Belgium's independence from the Dutch. The tune in question is the refrain of a duet, called Mieux vaut mourir que rester miserable (Better to die than to remain a miserable slave), and it very much ressembles the Marseillaise. I find it so cool that the Whitechapel people were sensitive to this!
By the by, it's flat as a pancake here as the swell report goes at J-Bay, and I've slept for 11 hours (with interruptions)!! Cheetahs sleep for 16-18 hours a day, to conserve energy. With the exception of Choby, my cheetah-specied love-interest, who never sleeps, he's too wired for that...
The tune in question is the refrain of a duet, called Mieux vaut mourir que rester miserable (Better to die than to remain a miserable slave), and it very much ressembles the Marseillaise. I find it so cool that the Whitechapel people were sensitive to this!
Hi Maria
I also find it very poignant the song Mary Kelly was singing the night of her death.
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Hey Fisherman, you didn't tell us what evidence you have that James Brown saw/heard someone else other than Stride.
(Do you know what the techno people say? Bip-bip-bip...James Brown is dead"!)
Hi Abby,
The little dialogue you made up reminds me of the movie Cape Fear (the remake by Scorcese, not the original)!
Personally I can't decide between an abundance of scenarios. In some of them the Ripper is a simple labourer, someone like Barnett (or perhaps even Barnett himself!). In some other he might be slightly better off, such as Jew, or even Le Grand. But he could also have been a Jew from very modest origins, like the mysterious Cohen...
Abby Normal wrote:
I also find it very poignant the song Mary Kelly was singing the night of her death.
Yeah, is has some Desdemona qualities in itself (like with the Willow Song), doesn't it?! And to think that the neighbours complained about the singing, but they didn't all hear her dying (besides the questionnable cry Oh, murder!)...
"I have my doubts about Lawende seeing JtR and Eddowes-he could have seen a different couple while the real couple was already in the alley.
I beleive he is the only witness to describe a blonde man plus he never identified stride as the woman?"
You are having me a bit confused here. Are we discussing Stride or Eddowes??
If you are speaking about the latter - and I think you are - it was said that the man Lawende saw was of fair complexion and wore a fair moustache. Lawende only saw the woman from behind, and his identification rests on her clothes and height, that tallied. Amongst other things, she wore a green skirt with a flower pattern on it, and so it would seem that the identification is correct. Still does not prove that hekilled her, though - only that he was with her at Church passage a very short time before she died.
That was Mike pulling my leg, Abby - what Marshall said was not that the man WAS a clerk, but that he gave the appearance of being one. If navy clerks did NOT look like clerks, let´s rule them out, shall we?
"Hey Fisherman, you didn't tell us what evidence you have that James Brown saw/heard someone else other than Stride."
I didn´t, did I? Well, no conclusive proof is there to refute that it was Stride, but we partly know that the man wore a coat that reached to his heels, meaning that he seems not to have been BS man, he was of average build, implicating the same, and he was 5 ft 7, once again pointing away from BS. And if Brown and Schwartz are both correct on the time, then Stride was with both Browns man and Schwartz´s ditto at the exact same time - a quarter to one.
Moreover, the woman Brown saw wore no flower to the best of his recollection, and Stride did by this hour, as testified by others.
Finally, and most importantly, Brown states that his couple stood at the corner of the Board School - which is where it was witnessed by Mortimer that a young couple stood as she was out at approximately ten to one, a couple who told Mortimer afterwards that they had not heard a sound of the killing in the yard.
So very much speaks for a case of mistaken identity on Browns behalf, methinks.
"I have my doubts about Lawende seeing JtR and Eddowes-he could have seen a different couple while the real couple was already in the alley.
I beleive he is the only witness to describe a blonde man plus he never identified stride as the woman?"
You are having me a bit confused here. Are we discussing Stride or Eddowes??
If you are speaking about the latter - and I think you are - it was said that the man Lawende saw was of fair complexion and wore a fair moustache. Lawende only saw the woman from behind, and his identification rests on her clothes and height, that tallied. Amongst other things, she wore a green skirt with a flower pattern on it, and so it would seem that the identification is correct. Still does not prove that hekilled her, though - only that he was with her at Church passage a very short time before she died.
The best,
Fisherman
If you are speaking about the latter - and I think you are
Yes i meant to write Eddowes there, sorry.
it was said that the man Lawende saw was of fair complexion and wore a fair moustache.
Does not fair mean blonde? Even if it dosn't he is the only witness i think who saw a man with fair hair (other than blotchy of course).
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
I think I agree with you about the possibility of a mistaken identity between Stride and her companion and the other, younger couple, Fisherman. As for the Whitechapel witnesses to have been correct on the time, I have the biggest reservations on this.
I'm about to go to bed (with Steven Pike's Surfing South Africa) after a biggish dinner, which included steak and onion rings - Spike's favorite food from BtVS!
"As for the Whitechapel witnesses to have been correct on the time, I have the biggest reservations on this."
As well you may have; if Brown and Schwartz had been in place at the exact same time, they would reasonably have seen each other. So one (or both) were wrong about the timing.
Comment