For those who missed Monty's post or who are confused about what "penny dreadfuls" are (especially as a few posters here in the past have purposefully tried to present them as actual historical records so that the contents of some could be used to support their own theories), The Curse Upon Mitre Square is a work of fiction. The murdering monk in it has not been shown to have been an actual historical person. Considering that the *only* evidence for his existence is a book that is undeniably nothing but a rather over the top melodrama in which the ghost of this monk was said to go around killing people, you should assume that it was made up for the purposes of the story.
But, should works of poorly-written gothic literature begin to be accepted as actual evidence in the Ripper case, I would suggest that Varney the Vampire should be considered the leading suspect in the murders. And sadly he would still not be the most outrageous person ever named as a Ripper suspect...
But, should works of poorly-written gothic literature begin to be accepted as actual evidence in the Ripper case, I would suggest that Varney the Vampire should be considered the leading suspect in the murders. And sadly he would still not be the most outrageous person ever named as a Ripper suspect...
Comment