Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eddowes Photograph

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Wolf,

    Many thanks for the clarification.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Wolf Vanderlinden
    replied
    David and Simon

    A few things about Lamoureux, Lacassagne and MacDonald’s books.

    American criminologist Arthur Macdonald’s 1893 book Le Criminel-Type dans Quelques Formes Graves de la Criminalité was not a French translation of an English work. It was, instead, a book published only in France. Chapter IV, La sexualité pathologique, contains a section, Observation IX, which deals with the Ripper. In 1892 MacDonald petitioned the British Home Office to see all the HO and police medical reports dealing with the murders but was turned down. From a reading of the chapter it is clear that MacDonald simply used newspaper reports rather than had any inside knowledge of the medical facts. There are no photographs in MacDonald’s book dealing with the Whitechapel victims (there are, however, prints of some of the murderers he studied).

    André Lamoureux’s 1894 doctoral thesis, De l’Éventration au point de vue médico-légal, has one photograph, that of Mary Kelly, which he probably got from his professor, Alexandre Lacassagne. I have not read Lamoureux’s thesis.

    Lacassagne published the Kelly photo and one of Eddowes, as you know. In his Chapter XI Les crimes sadiques there is a section on the victims of Jack the Ripper which is taken straight from Macdonald’s 1893 book (as is the entire chapter).

    Wolf.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark_Intent
    replied
    Originally posted by Scott Nelson View Post
    You've got to be kidding, right?



    Yes...?
    Mr Nelson
    No I'm not kidding!

    It's quite possible to be undecided on this photograph. On balance I think it Eddowes, but I'm interested in the many inconsistencies and the discussion around those and I don't rule out that one of those lines of argument may develop a viable alternative. Let's face it if everything was black and white life would be pretty boring huh?

    DI

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi David,

    Thanks for the Robert Desnos information. Mmmm, other than poking hot needles in my eyes, reading French surrealist poetry is my favourite pastime.

    Armed with your information I had a look around, and it appears that Lacassagne did not write the JtR chapter in his 1899 book. According to Wolf Vanderlinden's review of McLaughlin's book he lifted it wholesale from Arthur McDonald's 1893 book and simply added the Kelly and Eddowes photographs. So, no fresh French insights there. And it seems from what you say that Desnos did much the same. I hadn't realised there was such a healthy Ripper recycling industry going on at the time. Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Nelson
    replied
    Originally posted by Dark_Intent View Post
    I think this thread is fascinating
    You've got to be kidding, right?

    Originally posted by Dark_Intent View Post
    On balance though, I'd have to say that this is probably Eddowes
    Yes...?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark_Intent
    replied
    Dodgy Photo

    I think this thread is fascinating, so thanks to all for the interesting contributions.

    Many years ago, when I first saw this photograph along with the other Eddowes photos I felt there was something wrong with it. It simply didn't look like Eddowes to me. Without studying it in any depth, as has been done here, I guessed that it was Stride. At the time, I thought the hair looked more like Stride's and while the nose might be a point of contention, I had a theory that JTR punched his victims violently to stun them, before strangling them, so felt that it might tie in with that.

    On balance though, I'd have to say that this is probably Eddowes, but that it's a very "dodgy photo" as there as so many problems with it that can't be explained, as covered so well on this thread.

    With regard to the body, I certainly think the photographic flash has something to do with the lack of features that we see, but this might appear to have been magnified by something. Could it be that the body is covered with a thin light sheet? It would account for the lack of discernable features (breasts) and wounds, although for example the triangular mark may be where blood has come through. It might also account for what appears to be a collar on the neck wound. To me this seems possible, as for identification purposes you may well cover the body as best you could leaving only the face exposed. Try to minimise upset to any relatives etc.

    As to the face there are so many problems with this. The wound under the neck that might have teeth in it (a mouth) is difficult to explain (although the photo is of such poor quality) but this seems to link with the long thin cut running in a crescent up the right side of the face (left as we look at it). It's almost as if someone has replaced the face with another one delineated by the crescent cut and leaving a second mouth exposed underneath. Before anyone says so, I admit this is just a bit of speculation, but the face does raise some questions.

    In summary, I think it probably is Eddowes, but there are a good many odd features, possibly caused by the poor quality of the photo, possibly caused by tampering at the time or later, or possibly some other explanation.

    I look forward to more debate on this interesting historical piece.

    Cheers
    DI

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Sorry, David, you've got me stumped. Who is Desnos?
    Hi Simon,

    Robert Desnos was a French surrealist poet who wrote a series of fanciful articles on JtR (and on Vacher) in 1928 (for "Paris-Matinal"). Lastly, he met the Ripper (it's not clear, it could also be a Ripper's friend) in rue d'Assas...
    I think these articles have been translated in English by Eduardo Zinna.
    I've always wondered about his sources, and came to realize yesterday it was Lacassagne/McDonald.

    Desnos died in a nazi camp in 1945.

    Amitiés,
    David
    Last edited by DVV; 02-26-2010, 03:02 PM. Reason: My English is far too pure

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    Btw, Simon, what I read from McDonald in Lacassagne looks like a summary of the worst press reports (Kelly's heart found on her leg, mutilated woman in December 1887, and so on and so on...).
    I just realized that it's the main source used by Desnos for his 1928 articles. Several sentences are almost the same.

    Amitiés,
    David
    "Kelly`s heart found on leg"

    Now thats of interest, first report i have seen to suggest it was not taken away. I am sure that wasnt just plucked out of the sky.
    .

    Over to the jury for deliberation

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello all,

    Would somebody please tell me which particular part of the human anatomy is placed, when the skin is broken, under the jaw line, containing a bright white horizontal line interspersed with equi-distant vertical lines? It is certainly NOT the trachea, which is vertical and lower, also in the centre of the throat, not horizontal to one side under the jaw-line. I would imagine the doctors would notice such a wound protruding from the throat. Anyway, THIS line of bright pearly's isnt even connected to the throat wound.
    Right click on Eddowes pic and zoom in.

    best wishes

    Phil
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Phil Carter; 02-26-2010, 07:09 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Sorry, David, you've got me stumped. Who is Desnos?

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Btw, Simon, what I read from McDonald in Lacassagne looks like a summary of the worst press reports (Kelly's heart found on her leg, mutilated woman in December 1887, and so on and so on...).
    I just realized that it's the main source used by Desnos for his 1928 articles. Several sentences are almost the same.

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi David,

    I believe there's only the Kelly photograph [MJK1] in Lamoureaux' book. I have never seen it, nor McDonald's.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Simon,

    I've never seen Lamoureux's book.
    How many and which pics are there ?

    There are two, in Lacassagne's, and it's worth noting that Eddowes pic's caption reads : "last victim of JtR".

    Worth noting also, McDonald French translation was also published at Lyon (Storck, 2nd edition, 1894). Again, do you have this book, and if so, are there JtR related pics ?

    You certainly have something, Simon, with that "Lyonnaise connection" (Lamoureux, McDonald, Lacassagne).

    Amitiés,
    David

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi All,

    I haven't read Robert McLaughlin's "The First Jack the Ripper Photographs", so this may have already been covered.

    According to their respective biographies Melville Macnaghten and Robert Anderson knew Marie Francois Goron, chief of the Paris Surete, who in 1889 came to London to seek help with a murder case— L'affaire Gouffé—in which a process server had been strangled with the girdle of a dressing gown. Goron worked on the case with Dr. Jean Alexandre Eugene Lacassagne, Professor of Medicine from the University of Lyon.

    This chain of circumstance might explain how Lacassagne, via Goron, sourced the Kelly and Eddowes photographs for his 1899 book "Vacher l'Eventreur et les crimes sadiques", but does not immediately explain how the Kelly photograph had been obtained five years earlier by a medical student, André Lamoureux, for his 1894 thesis "De l'éventration au point de vue médico-légal", one of many theses "presented and defended before the faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Lyons during the school year 1894-1895". But as both men were at Lyon, and Lamoureaux' thesis was about evisceration, it is perfectly possible that his source for the photograph was Lacassagne.

    At a dinner given in London in March 1890 Marie Francois Goron said, "Nobody can blame your force in that matter [Jack the Ripper]. Those who criticize do not know what it means to hunt for a clue to a criminal who does not leave the slightest trace behind him. C'est impossible."

    Regards,

    Simon
    Last edited by Simon Wood; 02-26-2010, 02:28 AM. Reason: extra info

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Magpie,

    no, he didn't say anything about the provenance.
    Could it be McDonald - who is extensively quoted in Lacassagne ?

    Amitiés,
    David


    edit: Arthur McDonald, Le criminel-type dans quelques formes graves de la criminalité, 2e ed, Lyon, 1894 (trad, H. Coutagne)
    Last edited by DVV; 02-26-2010, 01:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X