Hi Bridewell,
Rising butt hinges were in use in the early 19th Century.
However, a small but bothersome point occurs to me.
The door to the yard opened outwards and, thus, if fitted with rising butt hinges, would have had a natural tendency to swing closed.
John Richardson would have had to prop it open whilst sitting on the step.
Regards,
Simon
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Time Factor
Collapse
X
-
Just a little biographical note:
Bagster Phillips' father had been an ironmonger ( for those of us on the left side of the pond, he ran a hardware store.)
Yes, thanks for the pictures, Stewart. Your valuable input is always appreciated. It looks like the seat to the privy on the ground to the left in the photo. In later years, the yard seemed to be quite a mess.
Leave a comment:
-
Unless what Cadosche heard was someone finding the body - and then scarpering?
Of course, Cadosche himself is no longer a wholly unsullied witness.
Phil
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Phil H View PostThere has been discussion on here to the effect that Richardson lied at the inquest. His story changes or evolves and becomes more elaborate.
The assumption was, I think, that he was embarrassed to reveal to his mother that he had not bothered to check the yard that morning. If he did go, and saw the body, but did not report it, he still had to brazen it out.
Richardson is, in my view, not reliable.
If, as I believe, Chapman was killed in the dark much earlier - around the time of Nichols' murder - then there was IMHO no way Richardson could have missed it at the time he says he was there.
Phil
But nor, presumably, could the person (people) whom Cadosch heard in the yard of No.29 between around 5.20am amd 5.25am?
Thanks, Stewart for posting the photograph. Those hinges do look like rising butts to me (assuming that such things did exist at the time!). Their use would ensure that the door was self-closing. I'll shut up now though as it's not an ironmongery thread.
Leave a comment:
-
There has been discussion on here to the effect that Richardson lied at the inquest. His story changes or evolves and becomes more elaborate.
The assumption was, I think, that he was embarrassed to reveal to his mother that he had not bothered to check the yard that morning. If he did go, and saw the body, but did not report it, he still had to brazen it out.
Richardson is, in my view, not reliable.
If, as I believe, Chapman was killed in the dark much earlier - around the time of Nichols' murder - then there was IMHO no way Richardson could have missed it at the time he says he was there.
Phil
Leave a comment:
-
So if the body WAS there,no way it wouldn't have been seen.....whatever type of hinge...Just look at the pictures,peeps!
Leave a comment:
-
Location of Chapman's Body
From the Chapman inquest reports -
John Richardson, "It was not light, but was getting so, and was sufficient for him to see all over the place."
Inspector Joseph Chandler, "Her head was towards the back wall of the house, but was some 2 feet from the wall, and the body was not more than 6 inches or 9 inches from the steps."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View PostI don't know if the door is the original, but in the photograph (1960's?) it seems to have rising butt hinges. For the benefite of anyone not familiar with them, these hinges cause the door to rise an inch or so from the closed to the open position; they also causes the door to close when released. If the hinges were indeed rising butts, the notion that Richardson sat with his back against it makes a great deal of sense.
That aside, I did assume from the testimony that the backyard door closed by itself. That does not mean it was designed that way, it could easily have closed by itself because the hinges were loose, worn, mounted wrong?
Leave a comment:
-
Rising Butts
Originally posted by Ginger View PostI've always believed that. The door not only opened to the left, but was spring-loaded.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ginger View PostI've always believed that. The door not only opened to the left, but was spring-loaded. In order to free his hands up to work on his boot, I think he probably turned his back to the door as he sat down, so that it wouldn't bump against his arm while he worked. If, in getting up, he turned to the right to go back inside, he need never have seen Chapman lying there.
Richardson: It was getting light, but I could see all over the place.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View PostOK, to back up, there is a school of thought that Anne Chapman had already died and was lying in the back yard when Richardson arrived, but he did not see her as the back door, which opened to the left, obscured his vision?
Leave a comment:
-
dull
Hello Chava. John later admitted that he could not cut it off so did so at work with a different knife.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
OK, to back up, there is a school of thought that Anne Chapman had already died and was lying in the back yard when Richardson arrived, but he did not see her as the back door, which opened to the left, obscured his vision? I imagine that might be possible, but only if the small area to the left of the door--the very short arm of the 'L' of the yard--was long enough to contain Annie's body. She was around 5' tall I believe. However the description of the body says she was lying with her legs drawn up and akimbo. I don't think there is enough room between the door and the fence for this and I have always assumed that her lower half would have been visible from the back step or the yard.
(Note to Ripperologists, did anyone look in the back yard for that piece of leather Richardson claims to have cut off? It should have been there. I doubt he would have put it in his pocket...)
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: