The Telegraph report (13-Sep) of the inquest says that when Richardson returned with the dessert knife he said "as it was not sharp enough he had borrowed another one at the market".
This appears to contradict what he said earlier about cutting the shoe on the step. Or should it be interpreted to mean that he did some cutting on the step and completed it with another knife later?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Richardson's View
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostYou will notice from this photograph that the door to the basement workshop of 29 Hanbury Street was recessed. Also that most illustrations show a canopy over the stairs leading down to it. So from Richardson's point of view sitting on the middle step the basement door was covered over, on his right, below and behind him.
How did he check the lock on the basement door without going into the yard?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes View PostHe sure does.
He's updating his site at the moment, so most of its not available. Fortunately, this little beauty still is:
https://jtr3d.com/category/hanbury-street/
Leave a comment:
-
You will notice from this photograph that the door to the basement workshop of 29 Hanbury Street was recessed. Also that most illustrations show a canopy over the stairs leading down to it. So from Richardson's point of view sitting on the middle step the basement door was covered over, on his right, below and behind him.
How did he check the lock on the basement door without going into the yard?
Leave a comment:
-
He sure does.
He's updating his site at the moment, so most of its not available. Fortunately, this little beauty still is:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DJA View PostHere's an earlier photo.Different door, not hung at the top step.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View Post
Thanks for this! That third step is still extremely shallow. But it makes it clear how much higher the door to the next back yard was in relation to #29. That fence was 5'6" tall I think. Cadoche would have been above it as he steps up to re-enter the house. If there was anyone right next door at #29 I can't believe he wouldn't have been noticed. And given there's hardly any room there between the houses, you'd hear & see a lot more than a faint cry of 'no' what with all the goings-on.
Does that imply Richardson could not only see straight over the fence, but could actually look at a body lying on the ground on the other side, not far from the fence?
If no, was he lying?
If yes, then what might Cadosch have seen if the murder was occurring when he goes outside the second time?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chava View Post
Thanks for this! That third step is still extremely shallow. But it makes it clear how much higher the door to the next back yard was in relation to #29. That fence was 5'6" tall I think. Cadoche would have been above it as he steps up to re-enter the house. If there was anyone right next door at #29 I can't believe he wouldn't have been noticed. And given there's hardly any room there between the houses, you'd hear & see a lot more than a faint cry of 'no' what with all the goings-on.
The top of 27's door is possibly 4" taller than 29's.Depends on how they were hung in 1888.
Apparently the fence was in very poor condition.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DJA View PostHere's an earlier photo.Different door, not hung at the top step.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DJA View PostHere's an earlier photo.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DJA View PostThat photo was taken over 60 years after the murder.
Soil and grass had built up.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: