Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Tumblety Challenge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Mike,

    Inspector Byrnes stated that " . . . there is no proof in his [Tumblety's] complicity in the Whitechapel murders . . ."

    How could he have said that unless he had been told by someone who actually knew?

    Regards,

    Simon
    Hi Simon,

    He WAS told that by Scotland Yard and they didn't have proof, but they certainly suspected him for numerous reasons. The lack of evidence is the reason why they wanted the gross indecency charges to stick (as per Byrnes' statement and the US papers). By extension of your logic Scotland Yard had no suspects, because they had no proof in anyone's complicity in the Whitechapel murders. No one saw the murders, thus, there were no true witnesses to the killings; just witnesses to punters, etc. In reality, they did have suspects and they investigated and followed them.

    Sincerely,
    Mike
    The Ripper's Haunts/JtR Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety (Sunbury Press)
    http://www.michaelLhawley.com

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Jonathan H View Post

      To be fair to Byrnes, we do not know he did not say this, not only to protect his own rep, but also to put Tumblety under a false sense of security.
      Very interesting Jonathan.

      Mike
      The Ripper's Haunts/JtR Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety (Sunbury Press)
      http://www.michaelLhawley.com

      Comment

      Working...
      X