Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is There a Caricature of Sickert on Kelly's Wall?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is There a Caricature of Sickert on Kelly's Wall?



    Look at item#3.

    c.d.

  • #2
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    I'm gonna say no!!

    FWIW when I zoomed in it looked like an elephant.

    Comment


    • #3
      It looks like Albert Steptoe.

      Hmm? Shabby genteel. Drinker. Misogynistic. Local to the East End. Had a horse and cart.
      Thems the Vagaries.....

      Comment


      • #4
        Does anybody see a torso to the right and down from the white line? Like arms, breasts, ribs?

        c.d.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by c.d. View Post
          Does anybody see a torso to the right and down from the white line? Like arms, breasts, ribs?

          c.d.
          Yes, I can make those out too. There are other indistinct marks on the wall further to the right of those which may or may not be something else.
          Why a four-year-old child could understand this report! Run out and find me a four-year-old child, I can't make head or tail of it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by c.d. View Post
            Does anybody see a torso to the right and down from the white line? Like arms, breasts, ribs?

            c.d.
            I can now. When I first looked, it looked like a man holding a baby (I've tried to fill in the outlines I was seeing below):

            Click image for larger version

Name:	Man_Baby.jpg
Views:	409
Size:	14.1 KB
ID:	781212

            These cloud picture games are fun. I recall years ago having found all sorts of different shapes and things in various versions of this image I've seen posted. I rather suspect none of them are visible in the actual photo though, and a lot has to do with aliasing during the digitizing process.

            - Jeff

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JeffHamm View Post

              I can now. When I first looked, it looked like a man holding a baby
              Or a ventriloquist dummy.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Ventriloquist.JPG
Views:	587
Size:	31.1 KB
ID:	781214

              Comment


              • #8
                I thought that we had a new suspect but….damn….Picasso was only 7 at the time.
                Regards

                Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                  I thought that we had a new suspect but….damn….Picasso was only 7 at the time.
                  Does that definitively rule him out though, Herlock?

                  Have you not seen The Omen???

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post

                    Does that definitively rule him out though, Herlock?

                    Have you not seen The Omen???
                    Don’t give people ideas Ms D
                    Regards

                    Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                    “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                      Or a ventriloquist dummy.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Ventriloquist.JPG
Views:	587
Size:	31.1 KB
ID:	781214
                      The ventriloquist looks like H.H. Holmes.

                      c.d.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by c.d. View Post

                        The ventriloquist looks like H.H. Holmes.

                        c.d.
                        Who said that!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Seriously though!

                          Here is the Kelly photograph which seems to show nothing at all.

                          I don't think that there's any mileage in these Rorschach exercises.

                          I'm slightly disappointed in Cornwell if she is putting this forward to back up her Sickert theory.
                          Whether you agree or disagree with her theory, there is no doubt that she has raised some very interesting questions re Sickert.


                          Comment


                          • #14
                            If it was drawn by Sickert, you have to wonder for what purpose? Was he thinking "I'll taunt the police by leaving my calling card. Of course, it will take a hundred and thirty years or so to be discovered and will require computer enhancement."

                            c.d.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'm waiting for Ike to weigh in on this.

                              c.d.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X