Go back to arguing with the people who agree with you on your conclusion. Maybe they’re wrong like you but for the right reasons. Or maybe they’re right about how the fake diary wasn’t faked, and for the right reasons, unlike you and yours, which is something you appear not to abide.
The Diary — Old Hoax or New or Not a Hoax at All?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lombro2 View PostGo back to arguing with the people who agree with you on your conclusion. Maybe they’re wrong like you but for the right reasons. Or maybe they’re right about how the fake diary wasn’t faked for the right reasons, unlike you and yours, which is something you appear not to abide.
So I ran your post through an online English to Italian translator and then back from Italian to English to see if it would help me understand it better and it came up with this:
"Go back and discuss with the people who agree with your conclusion. Maybe they're wrong, like you, but for the right reasons. Or maybe they're right that the fake diary wasn't fabricated for the right reasons, unlike you and your family, which you apparently don't accept."
I'd say it probably makes more sense in this form.Herlock Sholmes
”I don’t know who Jack the Ripper was…and neither do you.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lombro2 View PostBased on an argument I think is bonkers and I’m being kind.
But I’m in the minority according to you so it doesn’t matter. Of course, I’m actually in the majority of the people who actually understand the argument.
You and the defenders have now had 10 years to come up with one example from somewhere, just one, that refutes the point. But none of you have. And do you know why Lombro? Because that point of rebuttal doesn’t exist. 10 whole years and counting…..
All that you have is “surely this can’t be the case.” That’s it. David Barrat provided full evidenced proper research. Tracked through the years and following the way that language works in reality. You on the other hand rely on desperate wish-thinking. It’s sad to see that you and others are so committed to this fake that you will do and say absolutely anything to try and prop it up….as today’s lamentable, easily disproven charade has proven.Herlock Sholmes
”I don’t know who Jack the Ripper was…and neither do you.”
Comment
-
Sorry but you’re asking me to cherry pick for cherries that are in someone else’s backyard or kitchen. You can’t find something where you can’t go.
If your forger picked a Londoner, I might believe you. As it stands, I wouldn’t put it past a Liverpudlian to say, “I’m giving birth to the 20th Century!”A Northern Italian invented Criminology but Thomas Harris surpassed us all. Except for Michael Barrett and his Diary of Jack the Ripper.
Comment
Comment