"Yeah, that pretty much sums up what I'm seeing here, but Palmer may be inferring a more vulgar definition of 'getting off'. What other explanation is there for obsessively casting doubt on harmless, minority theories that pose no threat to majority views?"
I think it's somewhat harsh to imply that I generate "a colossal waste of bandwidth" simply because I fail to fall into line with the majority view.
My posts may well be harmless and pose no threat to the majority views (and Caz was quite correct to state this) but I'm not an ad populum kind of guy (some people are just desperate to be in the in-gang, but it's never been my gig, RJ - I literally do not care what anyone says as long as they aren't calling me a liar) so I paid no notice to it and will pay no heed to your assessment of the possible implications of it on my use of the world wide web's resources.
Comment