Originally posted by GUT
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vote the Diary
Collapse
X
-
-
At first, I was in agreement with Spider that a modern hoaxer would be easier to find, but now I believe otherwise. If you think Michael was just a patsy, the hoaxer could be anyone with the books, the science, and a lot of luck, channelling Jim and Jack.
If it's an old hoax, it would be much easier to find the 'forger' because he'd likely be in the Maybrick circle, and involved somehow in the Ripper investigation or have access to the information that was not released until the 1980s (e.g. matchbox was made of tin).
Then again, I think most of the Modern Hoax theorists think he's already been found no matter what you say - Michael.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by caz View PostA hoaxer might have, for a mischievous bit of fun.
1888 - the infamous murders in London
1889 - Maybrick's untimely (or timely?) death in Liverpool
The theme of the dairy is very much a Liverpool/London, north/south one, milking these two notorious cases for all they are worth. Possibly inspired by the cartoon Whitechapel at Whitehall, featuring Jack the Ripper on the left and Florie Maybrick on the right?
Love,
Caz
X
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spider View PostWhy would any forger pick a suspect living 200 miles away from the crime scene?
1888 - the infamous murders in London
1889 - Maybrick's untimely (or timely?) death in Liverpool
The theme of the dairy is very much a Liverpool/London, north/south one, milking these two notorious cases for all they are worth. Possibly inspired by the cartoon Whitechapel at Whitehall, featuring Jack the Ripper on the left and Florie Maybrick on the right?
Love,
Caz
XLast edited by caz; 02-05-2015, 06:56 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spider View PostAnd so my question goes unanswered save for the usual comedy rhetoric because no-one has the answer.
How very little casebook has changed in my absence
Regards
Maybe to assist Mrs M if it was forged around the time of her trial.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spider View PostI must be one of the few who believe in the 'diary' 100% all day long, or at least one of the even fewer that dare stand up and admit to it on this site, considering the amount of anticipated tirades faced in reply ;-)
The 'diary' was on poor footing from the start with it's dubious introduction, but putting this to one side my thoughts are, that the diary originated from Battlecrease House, making it's way to Ann Graham's family from her fathers step mother via a servant at Battlecrease.
When Maybrick say's in the 'diary' he will "place this where it will be found", there is only one place it could logically have been put. Maybrick couldn't risk it being found whilst bedridden and so must have kept it with him, if he lived it was safe, if he died it didn't matter.
The 'diary' was probably placed under the mattress. Had a family member found it, then it would have been destroyed. In all likelihood it would have been found by the lowliest servant of the house charged with changing the bed linen after Maybrick's death.
Regards
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spider View PostLove the title of the poll ;-) The Dairy of Jack the Ripper
Why would any forger pick a suspect living 200 miles away from the crime scene?
Regards
How very little casebook has changed in my absence
Regards
Leave a comment:
-
That'll be enough Dairy jokes Mr. Gut
Just try making a pole sometimes. Not as simple as it looks
Roy
Leave a comment:
-
I'd just assumed that they used "Dairy" because of all the BS around the "Diary".
Leave a comment:
-
Love the title of the poll ;-) The Dairy of Jack the Ripper
I just wonder if Old Hoax theorists are interested in finding their forger by looking at possible links between the Maybrick circle and the Ripper investigation.
Leave a comment:
-
Love the title of the poll ;-) The [B]Dairy[B] of Jack the Ripper
Why would any forger pick a suspect living 200 miles away from the crime scene?
Regards
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spider View PostI think that, had the 'diary' been a later forgery then the forger/nest of forgers would have been traced. An earlier forgery would be more difficult to trace.
I don't believe there's an Old Hoax theory per se, only an Old Document theory, so from that standpoint, I'd say the author's early, insider knowledge of the Ripper case, and of the Maybrick household, is a clue to the author himself.
Who or what is the link between Maybrick and the Ripper investigation, or between James and Jack himself? What was the connection and who would have made it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spider View PostIt is 'relatively' little in terms of publishing rights etc, wasn't it about £40k total? No idea what publishing books would bring.
If it were a forgery it didn't work out financially for the forgers that's for sure and Mr. Barrett certainly wasn't capable of undertaking it.
Regards
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: