If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
After almost 30 years of debate, where do you stand on the Maybrick Diary?
I can’t say I am particularly surprised that hoax favours undecided, real or possibly real.
I am a little surprised so many people think the Barretts in one form or another hoaxed it. Even
now.
Still, be interesting to see if that remains the case in the next few years.
I think the easiest interpretation of the Maybrick scrapbook is that it is a hoax - it looks dodgy, it isn't always perfectly aligned with what we believe we know is true about Jack, people not unreasonably don't want to be wrong, there is a lack of direct evidence which we would have otherwise expected to see (e.g., handwriting), and it superficially lacks a solid body of additional evidence which adds to the case. So seeing it as a hoax allows people to skip the greater effort of digging deeper to check that all of these surface issues are actually the deeper issues they infer them to be.
And then there's the problem of who did it and when. And that's where Mike Barrett bumbles like a buffoon into every wall the likes of Lord Orsam erects for him, so it is then easy for those who now assume the scrapbook is a hoax to rationalise Orsam's timeline as true. Orsam's position then becomes the dominant hoax theory so any poll which offers the Barretts as master hoaxers is inevitably going to see a large proportion of votes heading their way.
I trust that all of our dear readers are bearing in mind that arguments made ad populum are the very worst sort of bad science?
And then there's the problem of who did it and when. And that's where Mike Barrett bumbles like a buffoon into every wall the likes of Lord Orsam erects for him, so it is then easy for those who now assume the scrapbook is a hoax to rationalise Orsam's timeline as true. Orsam's position then becomes the dominant hoax theory so any poll which offers the Barretts as master hoaxers is inevitably going to see a large proportion of votes heading their way.
Ike -- This is 'dirty pool,' so characteristic of your cause. Even a child knows you can't campaign within 500 yards of a polling place! Tsk, tsk.
It has been well established that the language used in the book doesn't tally up with common use idioms from the era. Besides, there's the 'a bloke in a pub swears he has Jack the Ripper's diary!' angle...
Comment