The Diary—Old Hoax or New?

[caz]

Because Mike Barret a published author who claimed to have written the diary would be the last person who could have written the diary. Get real.

Since you are so well-informed, John, perhaps you could 'get real' and enlighten the rest of us regarding what you have decided Mike Barrett's [double t] motivation was for trying to make a clean breast of it, between June 1994 and April 1999, but then changing the story many times, and ultimately failing to produce his auction ticket, which would have finally cleared his guilty conscience in readiness for making his peace with his Maker in 2016.

Here's a bit of friendly advice: start by teaching yourself how to spell the man's surname correctly and your credibility will increase accordingly.

You are most welcome.

Love,

Caz
X

[John Wheat]

Honestly, ero b, my decision to block the child's posts (the first and only time I have ever done so in nigh-on 20 years of reading the Casebook) was the best thing I have done this year (Jack-related).

I strongly recommend it to you and anyone else who is simply irritated by his infantile repetition and bleating about things unproven as if they were fact.

Ike
Resting in Peace

I'm a child? Your the one who believes all the Maybrick bullshit.

[Iconoclast]

I should stress that I assume he is a child. I'd hate to think this behaviour was stemming from a grown adult.

[Iconoclast]

Who’s a pretty boy then?

Honestly, ero b, my decision to block the child's posts (the first and only time I have ever done so in nigh-on 20 years of reading the Casebook) was the best thing I have done this year (Jack-related).

I strongly recommend it to you and anyone else who is simply irritated by his infantile repetition and bleating about things unproven as if they were fact.

Ike
Resting in Peace

[John Wheat]

Who’s a pretty boy then?

Immaturity.

[erobitha]

It's pointless trying to educate the foolish. You are a troll by the way blindly accepting all the bullshit about Maybrick.

Who’s a pretty boy then?

[John Wheat]

Who's a pretty boy then?

It's pointless trying to educate the foolish. You are a troll by the way blindly accepting all the bullshit about Maybrick.

[erobitha]

The Barretts wrote the diary and the Watch markings were not written by James Maybrick.

Who's a pretty boy then?

[erobitha]

Anyone who thinks that Maybrick was the Ripper is a fool. I have now read the article you wrote it's wrong and extremely bias.

Why am I not surprised by the lack of counter arguments?

Okay, John, time to get back on your perch. Who's a pretty boy, then?

[John Wheat]

The Barretts wrote the diary and the Watch markings were not written by James Maybrick.

[John Wheat]

This response to me sums everything up about you on this thread, John.

Anyone who thinks that Maybrick was the Ripper is a fool. I have now read the article you wrote it's wrong and extremely bias.

[erobitha]

Why would I read all that bullshit? It's clearly wrong. This is the joke part of Ripperology.

This response to me sums everything up about you on this thread, John.

[John Wheat]

I wrote a detailed blog with handwriting examples:

https://jayhartley.com/the-inconvenient-truth-of-the-maybrick-watch/

I look forward to your detailed counter-arguments. I guess I might be waiting some time, though.

Why would I read all that bullshit? It's clearly wrong. This is the joke part of Ripperology.

[erobitha]

Whereas you are an example of the blind leading the blind.

If you think childish antics shuts down the debate, then I guess maybe it is you who needs the eye test.

[erobitha]

You still have not given any reasons as to why the watch markings are genuine.

I wrote a detailed blog with handwriting examples:

https://jayhartley.com/the-inconvenient-truth-of-the-maybrick-watch/

I look forward to your detailed counter-arguments. I guess I might be waiting some time, though.