Originally posted by Observer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostThen why did you suggest it ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iconoclast View PostQuite. Do let us all know when you find one. (Has to follow Tom Mitchell's original criteria mind - you can't just chuck in, "Erm, like the writing doesn't match the known formal handwriting of James Maybrick even though it wasn't written for an audience", etc.)
Good luck with that. You'll be a while.
Have a quick re-read of the original post, though, before launching in with stuff that isn't incontrovertible. One of the things you won't be launching in with will be "Ah, the hoaxer got it completely wrong, Maybrick's brother only wrote music". That one was offered up many a time before it was nailed by research.
Here's an idea - mention 'Poste House', or 'tin matchbox, empty', or the Crawshaw poem being found by Barrett, or Barrett's brilliantly asinine confession (and his next one and the one after that all interspersed with retractions), et cetera.
Not an incontrovertible fact amongst them.
As I say, you'll be a while ...
However, in retrospect, an individual who believes that most of the main players initials in the Maybrick saga can somehow be discernible in the Goulston Street graffiti is beyond help I fear.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostDear Iconoclast, I see that your membership to this Forum doesnt extend beyond August 2015. Believe me when I say we, many of us, have punched holes, many holes into the ridiculous notion that the Maybrick Journal is genuine. You are very fond of advising other posters to go read this, go read that, well, here's a bit of advice. Go and at look at the many thousands of posts devoted to the Maybrick Journal here in this Forum, it will open your eyes possibly to the fact that the Journal is one big hoax. As I said to Geddy earlier, it's all been discussed before.
However, in retrospect, an individual who believes that most of the main players initials in the Maybrick saga can somehow be discernible in the Goulston Street graffiti is beyond help I fear.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostYes indeed
I love a wee laugh at the end of the day.
But enough about you!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostBelieve me when I say we, many of us, have punched holes, many holes into the ridiculous notion that the Maybrick Journal is genuine.
That's fine. It's human nature. Don't sweat it.
But equally, own it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostGo and at look at the many thousands of posts devoted to the Maybrick Journal here in this Forum, it will open your eyes possibly to the fact that the Journal is one big hoax.
You haven't read a single one of the four books on the subject, have you?
Do you know how I know? Because a long exchange a year or so ago established that almost no-one who contributes to the Maybrick site has any insight whatsoever on the journal becuase they haven't read it nor read the books based on it.
Sam Flynn he'd read a facsimile of the journal on the internet and I swear I nigh on wet myself. Such experts!
You haven't read any of the books and you haven't read the journal because your mind was made up for you.
That's fine, mate. It's just human nature, is all.
Doesn't make you right, of course, but that's not something that really matters to you when you've already decided you are.
Every word, mate. Every word I have read.
Just saying is all ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by spyglass View PostHi,
Just one question, what makes everyone think that the clue that was left for everyone to see was the so called letters on the wall by the bed ?
Just saying.
Regards.
It may be time we put the band back together ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostIf I'm down in the dumps one sure fire way to "give me a wee laugh at the end of the day" is to read "The Dairy Of Jack The Ripper"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostThen there's no hope for you. Dream on.
Though I hate Liverpool (ironically). Can't forgive them for May 4, 1974.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iconoclast View PostNo you haven't. You've simply convinced yourselves that your opinions are all that is valid.
That's fine. It's human nature. Don't sweat it.
But equally, own it.
But don't sweat it, one day you may well come to your senses
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iconoclast View PostJust before I head to my bed, let me run one wee prediction by you.
You haven't read a single one of the four books on the subject, have you?
Do you know how I know? Because a long exchange a year or so ago established that almost no-one who contributes to the Maybrick site has any insight whatsoever on the journal becuase they haven't read it nor read the books based on it.
Sam Flynn he'd read a facsimile of the journal on the internet and I swear I nigh on wet myself. Such experts!
You haven't read any of the books and you haven't read the journal because your mind was made up for you.
That's fine, mate. It's just human nature, is all.
Doesn't make you right, of course, but that's not something that really matters to you when you've already decided you are.
Every word, mate. Every word I have read.
Just saying is all ...G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
Comment