Originally posted by Lombro2
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Acquiring A Victorian Diary
Collapse
X
-
Well this is a bit embarrassing.
According to Robert Smith in the 2019 version of his book, at a 2018 meeting with James Johnston and Keith Skinner:
“Lyons had admitted on film that he had indeed been working at Battlecrease on 9thMarch 1992…”
Now Caz tells us for the first time, six years after Smith’s published claim about Eddie having admitted being at Battlecrease on 9th March 1992, that:
“having revisited Eddie's fascinating account from 2018, I can confirm that no actual dates were mentioned by him”
She then asks a strange question “how could they be?”, as if the idea of Eddie having mentioned that he was in Battlecrease on 9th March 1992 was an obvious impossibility, despite it being the very thing we’d been assured had happened!
And still, incomprehensibly, no transcript is provided of what Eddie Lyons said in February 2018 let alone the video recording of the event. We have to rely on Caz’s own interpretation of what Eddie supposedly said. For some reason, we are not allowed to see for ourselves what he said and she doesn’t quote a single word spoken by him.
Unsubstantiated, unsupported claims are utterly worthless I’m afraid, as Smith’s unsubstantiated and unsupported 2019 claim proves.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lombro2 View PostYou’ve convinced yourself the Diary wasn’t in a cubby hole for 103 years. It should be easy to prove it and convince other people.
You even have another fairly valuable artifact in its own right you can use.
It’s been over 30 years now. What exactly are you waiting for?
It is pretty easy to prove, actually. We know the diary wasn’t written before 1945 due to the inclusion of the modern expression “one off instance”. Q.E.D. it couldn’t have been in a cubby hole for 103 years prior to 1992. End of story.
But the location of the diary wasn’t what Caz was talking in her most recent posts. Her only point was that Eddie Lyons was working in Battlecrease on 9th March 1992. She hasn’t provided any evidence to support this claim but, even if it’s true, it’s still a million miles from Eddie Lyons finding (and stealing) anything in the house that day, let alone the diary of Jack the Ripper.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lombro2 View PostYou really think a thief is going to put himself at the scene of the crime.
You have no concept of the criminal classes.
I guess this must mean that there was no crime, otherwise, by your own logic, he wouldn't have done this.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lombro2 View PostYou really think a thief is going to put himself at the scene of the crime.
Even the worst batter in MLB history didn't bat .000, but every post shows you defy the odds, Marcus!
Comment
-
What does Robert Smith and Jay Harley claiming it have to do with what was actually said versus implied.
I guess CAB this year is the only besides me who understands the criminal classes. “How can it be that he would do that?!” Exactly.
If that what Caz means, it makes me wonder who she’s been hanging out with lately.A Northern Italian invented Criminology but Thomas Harris surpassed us all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lombro2 View PostI guess CAB this year is the only besides me who understands the criminal classes. “How can it be that he would do that?!” Exactly.
She's clearly saying Eddie DID put himself at the scene of the alleged crime:
Originally posted by caz View PostHis memories were of a real event, and it was clearly the March job he was describing, because he said he was sent to the house with his mate Jim Bowling, but that it wasn't his job. ....
For whatever reason, it was the brief March job that Eddie was recalling, so the question is: what made that earlier occasion memorable, so long after the event, while the longer job in the July with the boss's son didn't even merit a mention?
But whatever. It doesn't matter.Last edited by rjpalmer; Today, 08:43 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lombro2 View PostWhat does Robert Smith and Jay Harley claiming it have to do with what was actually said versus implied.
I guess CAB this year is the only besides me who understands the criminal classes. “How can it be that he would do that?!” Exactly.
If that what Caz means, it makes me wonder who she’s been hanging out with lately.Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; Today, 09:15 PM.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Right! He remembered 26 years later because that was the day he stole the Diary from Battlecrease.
That’s what Caz was getting at. I should have known she wasn’t exhibiting inside knowledge of the criminal classes.
But just what are you getting at? He said. She said He didn’t say. But she said…. He described the right day but not the date so there’s no confession but he described the right day which he wouldn’t do if he was guilty….. So Lombo is wrong because he described the right day….Which he said a criminal wouldn’t do.
26 years later.
Last edited by Lombro2; Today, 09:42 PM.A Northern Italian invented Criminology but Thomas Harris surpassed us all.
Comment
Comment