Originally posted by Patrick Differ
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Any connection between Israel Lipski Trial and motive for Jack the Ripper?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Patrick Differ View PostWhile it might be true there is no evidence that Levy was the Ripper, I believe the circumstantial evidence gives him the highest consideration as a suspect. Where he lived, where he grew up, his conviction, his female dominated household, his vice, his skill as a butcher, his relationship with his brother Abraham, his incarceration at Chelmsford and Essex Asylum before the murders, the death of his mother in May 1888 and his relationship to Wentworth St Dwellings. Levy, with his skill as a butcher would know how to bleed out his victim, gut, and be home in less than 15 minutes is a compelling avenue for exploration. No direct evidence certainly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Differ View PostIs there a recommendation on reading about Bury? Would love to read it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Differ View PostI dont disagree with Kelly as a suspect but was he even in Whitechapel? Bury was evidently investigated and discounted. While it does not mean it wasn't them it's not clear how their weight would be greater than someone actually living there for their entire lives. And if the killer was in fact Jewish.
Welcome to the forum. So little is known about Kelly's whereabouts, it is a surprise to me that he rates so highly with so many people. Bury was investigated and discounted, but still has a following, particularly with the single suspect advocates. While it is currently fashionable to contemplate named suspects, the likelihood is that the perpetrator was an unknown person. If named suspects are to be contemplated, one could do worse than examine the known serial killers, rather than the domestic murderers. The likes of Deeming and Chapman. However, the actual killers were likely to have been Mr Nobodys, the persons that no-one even notices. We are here discussing a fantasy which will not be resolved short of a revolutionary discovery which, of course, will be disputed by all. I wish you all the best in the continuation of the game, what ever the outcome.
Cheers, GeorgeThe needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Hi Patrick,
Welcome to the forum. So little is known about Kelly's whereabouts, it is a surprise to me that he rates so highly with so many people. Bury was investigated and discounted, but still has a following, particularly with the single suspect advocates. While it is currently fashionable to contemplate named suspects, the likelihood is that the perpetrator was an unknown person. If named suspects are to be contemplated, one could do worse than examine the known serial killers, rather than the domestic murderers. The likes of Deeming and Chapman. However, the actual killers were likely to have been Mr Nobodys, the persons that no-one even notices. We are here discussing a fantasy which will not be resolved short of a revolutionary discovery which, of course, will be disputed by all. I wish you all the best in the continuation of the game, what ever the outcome.
Cheers, George
Comment
Comment