Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lets get Lechmere off the hook!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Old Man's Legacy

    The old man lay in bed, barely holding on. His breath was weak, his body still. His sunken eyes flickered with something, like he had one last thing to say.

    Thomas sat beside him, gripping his father’s thin hand.

    "Don’t talk, Father. Just rest," he said softly.

    The old man shook his head. "No, son. I have to tell you this. My last lesson. Listen up."

    Thomas leaned in, his throat tight.

    His father took a slow, rattling breath. "If you ever see someone in trouble… " He paused for effect. "Stop and stare."

    Silence.

    Thomas blinked. "Huh?"

    "Stop. And. Stare," his father repeated. "No matter how bad it looks, don’t rush in. Just watch. But.. " he lifted a frail finger.. "never actually help."

    Thomas frowned. "That makes no sense."

    The old man waved a shaky hand. "Let me finish."

    Thomas sighed but nodded.

    "If you see a guy collapse in the street, don’t panic. Just stop. Not too close.. then you might have to do something. Not too far.. you still wanna look concerned. Just… the right distance. Then, tilt your head. Maybe rub your chin. Makes you seem thoughtful."

    Thomas stared. "I should… just stand there?"

    "Exactly." His father gave a weak nod. "Then, when someone else shows up, look at them, then back at the guy on the ground, and say, ‘That’s something, isn’t it?’"

    "...That’s all?"

    "That’s all." The old man coughed, but a faint smirk played on his lips. "If they say, ‘Should we help?’ just sigh real deep and say, ‘Yeah… someone really should do something.’ But don’t move. Stay put. Like a tree."

    Thomas rubbed his temples. "And if they ask me directly to help?"

    "Ah." His father’s eyes twinkled. "That’s when you pull out The Gentle Deflection. Raise your hands a little, like you’re pushing away responsibility, and say, ‘Oh, I wouldn’t wanna make things worse.’ That way, you sound caring. Not… you know. Useless."

    Thomas was speechless.

    His father continued. "If they push harder, pat your pockets, look all stressed, and mumble, ‘I really should be getting to work.’ Doesn’t matter if it’s midnight. Just say it like it’s true."

    Thomas let out a slow breath. "...And if a crowd forms?"

    "Then you become The Concerned Eyewitness," the old man said weakly. "Mumble things like, ‘I saw him fall, but, uh, I didn’t wanna interfere.’ Or, ‘Happened so fast… was just about to step in.’ This makes it seem like you were involved. Without, you know. Actually doing anything."

    "...And if the cops show up?"

    His father’s face brightened, like he was proud of this part. "Now, this is key. Step forward juuuust enough to be noticed.. but not enough to be asked questions. Say something vague, like, ‘He was already like that when I got here.’ Then.. listen carefully.. start backing away. Slowly. No sudden movements. Just… fade into the background."

    His breath was growing weaker, but his expression was peaceful.

    "Son," he whispered, "a wise man does not act. A wise man observes. A wise man lets others take the lead.. so if things go wrong, it’s their problem."

    Thomas just stared at him. "...That’s literally just being completely useless."

    A tiny smile formed on the old man’s lips. "Exactly."

    And with that, he let out one last breath, that little smirk still on his face.

    Thomas sat there, stunned. His father was gone. But his words… oh, his words would haunt him forever.



    The Baron​

    Comment


    • I suspect "sheet" was added it explain what sort of tarpaulin Cross was referring to.

      Tarpaulin was a nick name for sailors and reputedly the source of the name "jack Tar".

      Weatherproof jackets and coats were made out of tarpaulin. I remember many moons ago, people were speculating that Cross thought it was a tarpaulin coat he saw.
      dustymiller
      aka drstrange

      Comment


      • "So Lechmere, the absolute legend, who just happened to be in the right place at the right time ..."

        It's symptomatic of the need to twist facts in order to make Cross look guilty that completely incorrect phrases like this keep being repeated, even though, often, the people claiming them know them not to be true.

        Charles Cross did not "just happened to be" in Bucks Row at about that time. He was there six days a week. Same approximate time, same place.

        dustymiller
        aka drstrange

        Comment


        • Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post
          I suspect "sheet" was added it explain what sort of tarpaulin Cross was referring to.

          Tarpaulin was a nick name for sailors and reputedly the source of the name "jack Tar".

          Weatherproof jackets and coats were made out of tarpaulin. I remember many moons ago, people were speculating that Cross thought it was a tarpaulin coat he saw.
          Some newspaper articles said that he thought it was a man's tarpaulin - Morning Advertiser, 4 September 1888; Evening Standard, 4 September 1888; Western Daily Press, 4 September 1888. That may also being people adding "men's" to explain what sort of tarpaulin they thought Cross was referring to.

          I'm not sure which it was. I'd expect a body to look more like a jacket than a sheet. OTOH, I'd expect a sheet that had come loose unnoticed to be more likely to be lying by the side of the road than a jacket.

          "The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren

          "Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer

          Comment


          • Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post
            Tarpaulin was a nick name for sailors and reputedly the source of the name "jack Tar".
            Indeed. Specifically, "tarpaulin" was the name given to a kind of waterproof hat worn by sailors.
            Kind regards, Sam Flynn

            "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

            Comment


            • Thanks to Dusty and Sam. I wasn’t aware of the connection between ‘tarpaulin’ and ‘jack tar,’ or the name of the waterproof hat.
              Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; Today, 11:42 AM.
              Regards

              Sir Herlock Sholmes.

              “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

              Comment


              • Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post
                "So Lechmere, the absolute legend, who just happened to be in the right place at the right time ..."

                It's symptomatic of the need to twist facts in order to make Cross look guilty that completely incorrect phrases like this keep being repeated, even though, often, the people claiming them know them not to be true.

                Charles Cross did not "just happened to be" in Bucks Row at about that time. He was there six days a week. Same approximate time, same place.
                Nothing changes Dusty. They love to present the ‘but he was there fact,’ but they’re not so keen on ‘not a single other person in crime history that ever found a serial killers victim outdoors turned out to have been the killer.’

                To me, that’s a cracking point, making Cross about as likely as a 25 stone ballerina, but strangely they forget to quote that one. Then again, they do have poor memories. Look how Christer forgot the word ‘about’ in the documentary and book. Easily done of course.
                Regards

                Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                Comment


                • If Cross was guilty (and he wasn’t of course) then he’d have taken any steps that he could to deflect attention or suspicion away from himself. Everyone can surely agree on this? So..

                  Why, after he’d had plenty of time to think before testifying at the inquest, didn’t he simply say when asked that he’d left home at exactly 3.35? Leaving himself with no time to kill Nichols?

                  Why didn’t he flee the scene, when it’s claimed by Crosstians that he was so worried about the wounds being revealed that he wouldn’t assist in sitting the victim up? Fleeing the scene would have avoided the problem in the first place.

                  Why, to avoid a meeting with a Constable as it’s suggested, didn’t he suggest that they would have had a greater chance of meeting one before arriving at work if the split up and went different routes? Allowing him to avoid one if he’d seen one.

                  Why didn’t he say that when he arrived at the body he heard (or even saw) someone running or walking away? Or why didn’t he say that there was a man standing near the corpse who said that he’d just found the woman lying there before asking him to wait with the woman while he went to find a Constable? He could even have given the police a description of ‘Jack.’


                  How STUPID was this bloke?
                  Regards

                  Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                  “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                    making Cross about as likely as a 25 stone ballerina
                    Hi Mike,

                    I initially read that as 25 stoned ballerinas and was wondering where the party was.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                      Hi Mike,

                      I initially read that as 25 stoned ballerinas and was wondering where the party was.
                      Hi Roger,

                      I think I prefer your version.
                      Regards

                      Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                      “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by The Baron View Post
                        The Old Man's Legacy

                        The Baron​
                        Why did you post a random bit of fiction that bears no resemblance to anyone involved in the Ripper cases?



                        "The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren

                        "Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                          Look how Christer forgot the word ‘about’ in the documentary and book.
                          Now now Herlock, let's not make things up. He 'forgot' twice in his book, once on the missing evidence and according to the narrator and the email from the director to Ed he forgot it once (at least) in the evidence presented to Scobie Doo.. bad case of amnesia

                          Click image for larger version  Name:	scobie evidence i.jpg Views:	0 Size:	40.3 KB ID:	846676

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                            To me, that’s a cracking point, making Cross about as likely as a 25 stone ballerina, but strangely they forget to quote that one.
                            I present after extensive research Jack the Ripper is....

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	images.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	11.5 KB
ID:	846678

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                              If Cross was guilty (and he wasn’t of course) then he’d have taken any steps that he could to deflect attention or suspicion away from himself. Everyone can surely agree on this? So..

                              Why, after he’d had plenty of time to think before testifying at the inquest, didn’t he simply say when asked that he’d left home at exactly 3.35? Leaving himself with no time to kill Nichols?
                              Indeed he could have given himself a cast iron or close to cast iron alibi if he'd adjusted him times to match Paul's.

                              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                              Why didn’t he flee the scene, when it’s claimed by Crosstians that he was so worried about the wounds being revealed that he wouldn’t assist in sitting the victim up? Fleeing the scene would have avoided the problem in the first place.
                              Sh*t I best cover up these wounds to avoid attracting attention to them, then I'll attract the attention of the first passer-by to my handiwork... Great plan.

                              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                              Why, to avoid a meeting with a Constable as it’s suggested, didn’t he suggest that they would have had a greater chance of meeting one before arriving at work if the split up and went different routes? Allowing him to avoid one if he’d seen one.
                              Mmmm I've an easy opportunity to make my escape, you go up Hanbury Street, I'll go along Old Montague... cover more ground improve our chances. However I'll go with you so I can find out where you work and make sure I dump a body there next week to implicate you for grassing me to the newspapers, even though as this juncture in time you actually haven't made your report yet.. but you will, I'm sure you will.

                              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                              Why didn’t he say that when he arrived at the body he heard (or even saw) someone running or walking away? Or why didn’t he say that there was a man standing near the corpse who said that he’d just found the woman lying there before asking him to wait with the woman while he went to find a Constable? He could even have given the police a description of ‘Jack.’
                              He didn't mention someone running off to give the coppers doubt in his guilt... I think this is because he wanted a couple of books, a fakeumentary and dozens of YouTube videos made about him some 130 years later so his Great Great Granddaughter could falsely adopt his birth name and wander around the internet claiming 'Lechmere dunnit' at every opportunity.


                              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
                              How STUPID was this bloke?
                              Thick as a whale omelette...

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Fiver View Post

                                Why did you post a random bit of fiction that bears no resemblance to anyone involved in the Ripper cases?
                                To be honest I'm not 100% the Baron did

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X