Originally posted by MrBarnett
View Post
Originally posted by MrBarnett
View Post
How is that so hard to understand?
Your speculation that someone knew him as Charles Lechmere, but knew nothing else about him, is not impossible, but it doesn't seem likely, either. And if this possibly imaginary person existed, what difference would that make?
If Charles Lechmere was guilty, the greatest threats to him being caught were from people who knew him and interacted with him frequently. They have the best chance of catching him in a lie, seeing him when or where he shouldn't be, or spotting unexplained bloodstains, bloody knives, or trophy organs.
But at the Inquest Charles Lechmere did not try to hide his identity from the police, his employers, his co-workers, his neighbors, or his family.
Comment