If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Russell Edwards, author of Naming Jack the Ripper, was always led to believe there was nothing left of Leavesden Hospital - the place where alleged…
It's interesting to see the quotation from Russell Edwards in that article: Mr Edwards disputed this saying: "The Jack the Ripper community don’t want this to ever be solved so what they’ve done is used the name of a scientist, who’s thrown doubt on the scientific work, and they ignored the fact we got a match.
"But we can easily eliminate this. They’ve obfuscated the truth."
One wonders why he thinks members of the community tried to help him with his research in the first place, if they didn't want the case to be solved!
It's interesting to see the quotation from Russell Edwards in that article: Mr Edwards disputed this saying: "The Jack the Ripper community don’t want this to ever be solved so what they’ve done is used the name of a scientist, who’s thrown doubt on the scientific work, and they ignored the fact we got a match.
"But we can easily eliminate this. They’ve obfuscated the truth."
One wonders why he thinks members of the community tried to help him with his research in the first place, if they didn't want the case to be solved!
All I can say is there obviously isn't much going on in Watford if they can make a full page out of that!
Amanda
I agree, Russell Edwards clearly comes across as an altruistic seeker of the truth. Or maybe I've just slightly misread him and his intentions!
Yes how dare people insinuate that Mr Edwards was purely after money he didn't solve the case but he certainly gave the jelly bean industry a much needed boost in these hard financial times
Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
The scientific community has never accepted a pop culture book as a scientific case in the first place. Its done through academic journals. If they don't reference the primary sources on this subject then its value is about as much as a blog.
Selling things by slapping science on it has been going on since magical oils where invented to cure all ills.
The fact is the books findings have never been presented scientifically as scientists do it, despite this avenue being available to them 24/7.
When you want to shout "case closed" you must make sure you have your facts right because lots of people will part with their money and buy your book and to take money of people knowing your facts are wrong or not checking your facts properly is wrong and is borderline to fraud.
Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
When you want to shout "case closed" you must make sure you have your facts right because lots of people will part with their money and buy your book and to take money of people knowing your facts are wrong or not checking your facts properly is wrong and is borderline to fraud.
If you are in the business of making money, all you need to do is to shout "case closed" louder and louder to block the voice of reason trying to distract the paying public. And when you don't have the facts, there's always the good old personal attacks.
I wonder how it is proposed that Russell Edwards would have planned to make money from his book? It was Dr L. who identified the DNA, which was either something he did honestly (albeit making a quite serious mistake) or was something he was paid to do, for which there is absolutely no evidence at all. In effect Edwards merely supplied the "apron" and then went along for the ride with whatever Dr L told him. It's hardly surprising that he might have seen £ signs when he got the results. who wouldn't. Oterise I am not sure how this book could have been perceived as a money-making enterprise before Dr L gave his verdict.
I wonder how it is proposed that Russell Edwards would have planned to make money from his book? It was Dr L. who identified the DNA, which was either something he did honestly (albeit making a quite serious mistake) or was something he was paid to do, for which there is absolutely no evidence at all. In effect Edwards merely supplied the "apron" and then went along for the ride with whatever Dr L told him. It's hardly surprising that he might have seen £ signs when he got the results. who wouldn't. Oterise I am not sure how this book could have been perceived as a money-making enterprise before Dr L gave his verdict.
I can't recall many authors who have opened a jack the ripper gift shop shortly before they have had their book published.
Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment