Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kosminski and Victim DNA Match on Shawl - Part 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Replace each ! with a 0 and you'll be getting closer.
    There was conversation on Facebook last week that the paper back is due for release in July. So its possible that it might contain updated information.

    If they were going to that would be the opportunity

    Yours Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
    Just the 1!!!!!
    Replace each ! with a 0 and you'll be getting closer.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Just the 1!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • andy1867
    replied
    Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
    Anybody know if Mr Edwards has made any public statement about his book recently?
    I dunno...he's free to announce 1 unhappy recent customer if he wants.............

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Anybody know if Mr Edwards has made any public statement about his book recently?

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Leahy View Post
    ISnt that because the DNA fiasco has just been a storm in a tea cup?

    The answer to the JtR puzzle is about to unfold..and should be followed this week on facebook as it happens live…

    The 'definitively ascertain fact' is going to be resolved…coming soon..
    More details how can I find it on Facebook please

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    ISnt that because the DNA fiasco has just been a storm in a tea cup?

    The answer to the JtR puzzle is about to unfold..and should be followed this week on facebook as it happens live…

    The 'definitively ascertain fact' is going to be resolved…coming soon..

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    I might have missed it but has Mr Edwards issued an apology yet I think he should do a lot of people who might have had a lot to offer to this case have been put of and will never contribute purely because of this book.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Yes so glad it wasn't just tacky money.
    That's right it was never about the money when a builder teams up with a scientist to solve a 125 year old murder mystery they can only be doing it for the benefit of the general public it's just a shame they didn't have the time to buy a calculator and get the maths side of it correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    It's probably because it's so noticeable these days in Asia where men (especially) can't do anything for themselves...I mean, nothing.

    You won't find any Kosminskis in Asia.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Don't you love people who admit "I can't be bothered to read it but has anyone said ...?"
    Love them. Actually, I can't stand helpless people who don't do a little honest work before they ask others for help. It's probably because it's so noticeable these days in Asia where men (especially) can't do anything for themselves...I mean, nothing.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
    I take it because the souviner shop has now closed that all this shawl business has come to an end I'm just pleased it wasn't an attempt to extract money from the general public but a proper scientific investigation into the ripper murders.
    Yes so glad it wasn't just tacky money.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
    This has been said 10,000 times. Now, 10,001. Thanks for not reading through the posts here and elsewhere.

    Mike
    Don't you love people who admit "I can't be bothered to read it but has anyone said ...?"

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by chastenor View Post
    I'm sorry, there are 120 pages of this and I got bored after about ten. Has anybody pointed out that even if the provenance of the shawl is reliable and even if Kosminski wanked over it, that doesn't prove that he was Jack the Ripper. Indeed, given the circumstances, it could be argued that it is more likely that Kosminski did wank over this prostitute's shawl than not. Plus, what is the consensus now about the diary? I have always thought that the evidence of the diary and Feldman's book was conclusive. Has anybody actually proved otherwise?
    This has been said 10,000 times. Now, 10,001. Thanks for not reading through the posts here and elsewhere.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • RockySullivan
    replied
    Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
    I take it because the souviner shop has now closed that all this shawl business has come to an end I'm just pleased it wasn't an attempt to extract money from the general public but a proper scientific investigation into the ripper murders.
    Lol thank god they finally solved the case!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X