Kosminski and Victim DNA Match on Shawl - Part 2

[Monty]

Hello Monty,

Thank you. Surely then, that evidence, in looking back on 1888, family lore included, must have a greater say than an UNPROVABLE claim MADE in 2014 to tie in with the lore of the family story, no?

regards

Phil

I rarely deal with family lore, I prefer facts.

And so far, the facts lead away from family lore, and Edwards/Andy Parlours suggestion of Fenian duty.

As for the science bit...peer review is the only route, however there is a fear by Edwards to permit that.

That leads to a telling conclusion.

I've been told the science is not conclusive. The stats are irrelevant, as David Brent stated, stats are akin to a lamp post for a drunk...more to lean on than for illumination.

Monty

[Chris]

So if another expert says there has been a mistake made - then what? It is suddenly ok to accept what Chris is saying all along?

I think you'd need to take the best of three. Or maybe the best of five. Is five enough, though?

We'd need a Professor of Statistics to tell us that, wouldn't we? Or maybe three, just to be on the safe side. Or maybe five ...

[tji]

You also miss my point. Let another expert tell him if he's made a mistake.

So if another expert says there has been a mistake made - then what? It is suddenly ok to accept what Chris is saying all along?

Tracy

[Phil Carter]

You also miss my point. Let another expert tell him if he's made a mistake.

Hello Observer,

So what is wrong with other people, other than qualified experts, telling him?... Ummm.. if most of the people telling David Moyes had been listened too last year by David Moyes, Man Utd may have had a better season... and they weren't other managers.. but people who know football. To them they SAW the mistakes as clear as daylight. Moyes did not. But they tried to tell him. They weren't experts... but they were right... and had the right to point out his errors too.


regards

Phil

[Observer]

Admin Note:
This thread is a continuation of another thread. To view the original thread, please click here.

Distinguished scientists are capable of making mistakes. History is replete with examples of very experienced scientists making errors.

Linus Pauling got his model for DNA structure wrong in an effort to make a publication deadline.

Einstein thought the universe existed in a steady state.

And so on.

Dr Louhelainen is still human.

You also miss my point. Let another expert tell him if he's made a mistake.