Perfect mDNA match is proof of fraud

[mklhawley]

Hi all,

According to the article, Karen Miller's (maternal descendent of Eddowes) mDNA is a 100% perfect match with Eddowes and Matilda's (maternal descendent of Kosminski) mDNA is a perfect match with Kosminski.

It is physically impossible for the mDNA of a descendent to be a perfect match with an ancestor. A generational mDNA mutation rate of 3 X 10 to the minus 5 guarantees this.

A 100% perfect match CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING, the mDNA on the shawl is the same at the living descendent's, i.e., it's a fraud.

...unless the article lied and it wasn't a 100% perfect match. If so, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

Sincerely,

Mike

[mklhawley]

Am I wrong on this point?

[GUT]

Well you know my view.

I have viewed literally hundreds of DNA reports in paternity matters that is is Mr "X" the father of child "B". So pretty close relationships the highest I have ever seen [and remember we are talking nuclear DNA here] is 99.9999% or 1 chance in a million that it's wrong.

So 100% nope, don't think there's a DNA lab in the world that would sign off to that.

However I don't think that it's fraud just "puff" to garner interest.

[mklhawley]

Puff it is then. Thanks GUT

[GUT]

In case you don't know puff = BS.

[wolfie1]

In case you don't know puff = BS.

[The Good Michael]

I thought 'Puff' was a magic dragon. But so is this shawl.

Mike

[GUT]

I thought 'Puff' was a magic dragon. But so is this shawl.

Mike

WHAT???

The Shawl is a Magic Dragon, now t all makes sense.

[Barnaby]

Is the shawl made from hemp? Can we smoke it?

[Limehouse]

Is it known whether these tests were carried out using the LCN DNA testing method?

[GUT]

Is it known whether these tests were carried out using the LCN DNA testing method?

Short answer no not known at this point of time.

[Limehouse]

Thanks GUT.

[lynn cates]

not wrong

Hello Mike. No, not wrong.

Frankly, how could it EVER be shown that these "descendants" did not deposit their DNA recently?

Cheers.
LC

[pinkmoon]

Hi all,

According to the article, Karen Miller's (maternal descendent of Eddowes) mDNA is a 100% perfect match with Eddowes and Matilda's (maternal descendent of Kosminski) mDNA is a perfect match with Kosminski.

It is physically impossible for the mDNA of a descendent to be a perfect match with an ancestor. A generational mDNA mutation rate of 3 X 10 to the minus 5 guarantees this.

A 100% perfect match CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING, the mDNA on the shawl is the same at the living descendent's, i.e., it's a fraud.

...unless the article lied and it wasn't a 100% perfect match. If so, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

Sincerely,

Mike

I won't waffle on but the one thing has made me doubt all this is quite a simple one the man behind all of this has recently opened a ripper shop that sells a lot of interesting things including an authentic very collectable hand crafted made from the finest plastic that mankind can provide yoyo.check at the website www.jacktherippertoursandstore.co.uk

[MrBarnett]

Pink ,

I never had you down as a yoyophobe.

MrB