Originally posted by GUT
View Post
Kosminski and Victim DNA Match on Shawl
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
I think...
I think that the new book should be read alongside the Parlours' 1997 account of the shawl. My guess is that they will be pretty much the same. There's not much new in Ripperworld.SPE
Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Comment
-
-
Off
Anyway, I'm off to bed to dream about my new found fame...SPE
Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Comment
-
Stewart,
There you go with your 'deep' again. Is Lolesworth Street any deeper into H division than Mitre Square is into the City?
And are we to believe that the Met/City would co-operate to catch a few petty fish thieves but not in the case of the WM or potential terrorists?
MrB
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostThat's the story which has been passed down, it needn't necessarily be the truth.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by spyglass View PostHas Trevor Marriott suggested that maybe a dog picked it up and ran off with it or even....no no lets not go there"G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
G'day Gut,
The story goes that Amos asked permission to take the shawl from his superiors.
That is quite clearly absolute bollocks. If a PC did obtain the shawl, either in Mitre Square or subsequently in the WM investigation, he nicked it while no one was looking.
Of course,we have no written record of a policeman stealing a valuable item from the crime scene, or subsequently, but then why would we?
MrBLast edited by MrBarnett; 09-09-2014, 05:15 PM.
Comment
-
Comment