answer?
Hello Colin. Thanks.
"[H]ow does Elizabeth Long arrive at "looked like a foreigner" in respect of a man she only saw from behind?"
Good question. Any idea for an answer?
Cheers.
LC
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Kosminski the man really viable?
Collapse
X
-
Eagle and Dimshits
Hello Phil. Thanks. The drawings of Eagle and Dimshits, however, seem to lack that.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tecs View PostDear all,
I think that our terror of appearing racist/anti semitic/bigoted etc stops us from admitting that certain peoples do possess certain characteristics. I attended a meeting at a Jewish club last year and it was obvious without being told that many people there were Jewish. This doesn't mean that all of the Jewish people that were there were of very obvious Jewish appearance, but many were. Also, I asked my wife a few weeks ago if one of the mums from school was Polish. She confirmed that she was. I couldn't tell you what somebody Polish looks like or to put it another way, how a Polish person differs from an English person, but she just did. i can't explain it but it is something I could identify.
It's also important to remember that the Police bent over backwards to stop any anti-semitic tensions. They changed (doctored some would say) Hutchinson's description of Jewish to foreign and Charles Warren himself wrote, probably disingenuously, to the press to say that Juwes didn't mean Jews in any known language.
And Martin Fido reckoned that Long's assessment of his foreigness came from hearing his accent.
regards,
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View PostHi Lynn,
Similarly, how does Elizabeth Long arrive at "looked like a foreigner" in respect of a man she only saw from behind?
Regards, Bridewell.
She saw a man with an egg and bacon sandwich lodged into the top of his torn coat shoulder.. and as he was muttering in French tones, thought he was the lunchpack of Notre Dame.
best wishes
Phil
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Phil Carter View PostHello Lynn,
Without deliberately donning the "Fagin" look from Charles Dickens, I'd guess a hooked nose may have something to do with it. No offence at all to any member of the Jewish Faith.
And before anyone accuses me of saying anything that shouldn't be said in this politically correct world, I am talking about "then" public perceptions.
They are not mine.
best wishes
Phil
Of course the problem is that if you walk into any synagogue, maybe a third of Jews look like that. And it's not due to some weird spate of intermarrying. We just dont have a look. Now I have red hair, green eyes, pale skin. I did used to have a bit of a hook, but after a car accident when it had to be reattached I lost it. But my sister never did. She has light brown hair, blue eyes, eye watering pale skin. But she takes after my mother, who was born a Scottish Catholic. I look exactly like my paternal great grandmother. Who was from Klodawa. Her sisters were blonds and redheads, light eyes, pale skin. She didn't have the nose, but my grandfather evidently introduced that into the family, and since his father was Austrian, it could be the German hook and not the Semitic hook.
If there was never any intermarrying ever, Jews still would not look like pale Arabs. A lot of them would, but our phenotype has redheads, it has blonds, it has light eyes. So "looks Jewish" really in the entire course of history has only applied to someone wearing tzitzit and a kippah. Which is pretty Jewish.
Based on no science whatsoever but given the dominant phenotypes in Poland, Kosminski probably did not "Look Jewish" he might had a hooked nose, but that tends to come from either extremely isolated communities, which Klodawa was not, or Germanic regions, which is stretching it a bit. He probably had medium to light brown hair, brown or hazel eyes, light skin. I mean, I could totally be wrong on this, but that's what Polish Jews tend to look like. Russian Jews tend to be darker, but with more blondes cropping up.
My (VERY Semitic) uncle was in Japan for a six week conference, and towards the end of his stay, he was astounded to find that there was a Synagogue in Tokyo. So he goes for Shabbat, and he is very impressed with the service. Afterwards he goes to introduce himself to the Japanese Rabbi and congratulate him on his sermon, and after he shakes his hand, the Rabbi gets a wicked smile on his face and tells my uncle "Funny, You don't look Jewish."
Leave a comment:
-
Dear all,
I think that our terror of appearing racist/anti semitic/bigoted etc stops us from admitting that certain peoples do possess certain characteristics. I attended a meeting at a Jewish club last year and it was obvious without being told that many people there were Jewish. This doesn't mean that all of the Jewish people that were there were of very obvious Jewish appearance, but many were. Also, I asked my wife a few weeks ago if one of the mums from school was Polish. She confirmed that she was. I couldn't tell you what somebody Polish looks like or to put it another way, how a Polish person differs from an English person, but she just did. I can't explain it but it is something I could identify.
It's also important to remember that the Police bent over backwards to stop any anti-semitic tensions. They changed (doctored some would say) Hutchinson's description of Jewish to foreign and Charles Warren himself wrote, probably disingenuously, to the press to say that Juwes didn't mean Jews in any known language.
And Martin Fido reckoned that Long's assessment of his foreigness came from hearing his accent.
regards,Last edited by Tecs; 11-13-2012, 05:23 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by harry View PostI think the reason w hy no progress has been made,is because prime suspects,so called,as evidence Kosminski,has little value,and that the evidence against them is so weak,it would be foolish to place too much trust in a belief that any were JTR.
You, I, all of us are not party to the full information and why Kosminski was suspected.
It would be even more foolish to dismiss someone who was suspected at the time when the full facts are not known.
Monty
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Colin. Thanks.
Incidentally, has anyone ever figured out what it means to be Jewish looking?
Cheers.
LC
Similarly, how does Elizabeth Long arrive at "looked like a foreigner" in respect of a man she only saw from behind?
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Colin. Thanks.
Incidentally, has anyone ever figured out what it means to be Jewish looking?
Cheers.
LC
Without deliberately donning the "Fagin" look from Charles Dickens, I'd guess a hooked nose may have something to do with it. No offence at all to any member of the Jewish Faith.
And before anyone accuses me of saying anything that shouldn't be said in this politically correct world, I am talking about "then" public perceptions.
They are not mine.
best wishes
Phil
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by harry View PostI think the reason why no progress has been made,is because prime suspects,so called,as evidence Kosminski, has little value,and that the evidence against them is so weak,it would be foolish to place too much trust in a belief that any were JTR.
Agreed. Totally agreed.
Plus the fact that for much of the time we have had people making false claims of having found Jack the Ripper. Or the solution. Or the answer to the riddle. Or, or, or. The prime suspect range you write of, is as wide as a river. All inclusive IF one makes a theory sound convincing enough. You pays yer money, you buys a theory, you hold on to it for life.
Not many have changed their opinions dramatically. Result? Deadlock, ever riding roundabouts, wheels re-attached onto faltering wagons for the umpteenth time and theories ground into total stalemate without any evidence to bring the theory forward one iota.
Kosminski, Druitt and Tumblety are all at a stalemate.A bunch of nobodys getting us nowhere.. and it has been that way for a long time now. It can, and will never change, until someone realises there is more to all this than weak theories based on nobodys, and that simply put..the SIMPLE ANSWER doesn't work. 125 years of study.. and the simplest solution doesn't work because somebody made it difficult by nicking, sorry, borrowing and never returning, official case material.
We have a classic trio. The dead one, the mad one and the one that ran away abroad. Or should I say..The hung, the drawn and the one in all quarters but London.
Add in a touch of Royalty, a doctor and an insanely jealous husband, and the pretty picture is complete when the painter takes a bow.
The "Magnificent 7" strikes again. Druitt, Kosminski, Tumblety, Prince Eddy, Sir William Gull, James Maybrick and Walter Sickert.
If any more oil isn't poured out over on these people's reputations within the next 18 months or so, I'll be very surprised.
All for a "Fistful of Dollars", no doubt. Or a "Few Dollars More", perhaps.
best wishes
Phil
Leave a comment:
-
What does it all mean?
Hello Colin. Thanks.
Incidentally, has anyone ever figured out what it means to be Jewish looking?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Oops
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Colin.
"I think the only significant evidence is the Hutchinson sighting which, if genuine, puts a victim in the company of a Jewish man, heading towards 13, Millers Court two hours before the likely time of death. Either Hutchinson is a liar or there is evidence linking a 'canonical' victim to a Jewish man at the material time."
Or, better, a "Jewish looking" man.
Cheers.
LC
Indeed. My apologies for the error.
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by harry View PostI think the reason w hy no progress has been made,is because prime suspects,so called,as evidence Kosminski,has little value,and that the evidence against them is so weak,it would be foolish to place too much trust in a belief that any were JTR.
RH
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: