Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Koz - No First Name in Marginalia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman
    I feel in necessary to remind you that Tom is "the foremost authority on the case", and is due the respect befitting his position.
    The World's foremost authority on the case, Wick. And you're quite right.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi Cog. If I'm the worst bully the Casebook has to offer, then these are indeed banner times for the boards. And for the record, I don't mind being called a blowhard, but never a redneck. You would appreciate why I say that if you spent some time in Oklahoma and saw some REAL rednecks.

    But just for the record, I can't recall having violently attacked anyone because I didn't like their view on something. In fact, it has been a very, very long time since I 'attacked' anyone on the boards..period. You have admittedly been reading back many years on the boards recently and me thinks that maybe five years worth of posts read in the course of a couple of months have given you a skewed view of what's going on in the here and now. In other words, you suddenly jump my arse for citing a rule, because you caught some posts I wrote on a bad day five years ago and it pissed you off. Are you picking up what I'm throwing down?

    And thanks for the comments about the book I'm writing. I'm even amazing myself with it. And it will contain all of Monty's unseen photographs.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Cogidubnus View Post
    If I had to make a totally unconsidered response, I'd name you Tom...

    However, even according to your own testimony, you're just another would-be-redneck and blowhard...you don't fool me, and besides there are far worse on-line bullies than you...

    More to the point, obnoxious as you are, you do have a number of valid arguments to raise...and I'm honestly dying for your LeGrand book to be published...I'll bet it to be a good one...GO TOM GO!

    I feel it necessary to remind you that Tom is "the foremost authority on the case", and is due the respect befitting his position.

    (We know because he told us)



    Last edited by Wickerman; 06-29-2012, 11:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Hi Phil. Please name the 'inner circle' for me and I'll send Le Grand now to snap their necks.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott
    Hello Tom,

    hahaha! Le Grand...lol ok.. now he WAS a bully.. I'll give you that!


    best wishes

    Phil
    Last edited by Phil Carter; 06-29-2012, 11:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello Tom.,

    The "bully-boy scare 'em off" tactics don't work, as has been seen yonks ago.
    The belittling tactics don't work. The ignore tactics don't work. There is a list but I can't remember what the rest are.

    Its an old and worn out record.

    You and I for example dont agree about Le Grand, but I'll give you one thing.. it isnt Kosminski, Tumblety and Druitt regurgitated ad infinitum.
    That is what the essence of the problem is, as Simon has said.

    I saw an article title the other week.. "Montague Druitt, the suspect that just wont lay down" or something like that.
    No new evidence... but more regurgitation. Its 125th coming up.. and you can bet your backside someone is lining up something to do with those three, and Sickert, to cash in.

    best wishes

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    If I had to make a totally unconsidered response, I'd name you Tom...

    However, even according to your own testimony, you're just another would-be-redneck and blowhard...you don't fool me, and besides there are far worse on-line bullies than you...

    More to the point, obnoxious as you are, you do have a number of valid arguments to raise...and I'm honestly dying for your LeGrand book to be published...I'll bet it to be a good one...GO TOM GO!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi Phil. Please name the 'inner circle' for me and I'll send Le Grand now to snap their necks.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Dave,

    What can we do to rectify the situation?

    Stop discussing all the tired old crap we've been regurgitating for the past 125 years.

    Come to our senses and realise that SY's finest were not necessarily telling the truth.

    Stop swapping ill-informed opinion and knuckle-down to some serious research.

    That would be a giant step forward.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Hello Simon,

    Yes, I totally agree..., but you know and I know it won't happen because some people have a vested interest it seems in keeping the wheels on the wagon going around and around in perpetuity. Until that rubbish stops we get nowhere. Until the mould is broken from within the inner circle.. it will carry on and on, and some will be laughing and derising at all attempts to try to stop it.

    best wishes

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Three active posters on this thread are Simon, Trevor, and Monty...three posters who like to post about what they're not ready to post. Let's see if we can't point this army of bullies THEIR way and see what can be shaken loose.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Well, that one was a no-brainer. Okay, name two. Cog's turn.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott
    If he cant please let me

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott
    I will Paul Begg
    Well, that one was a no-brainer. Okay, name two. Cog's turn.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    No humor/humour. I'm sick of hearing that the Casebook posters are a bunch of bullies who chase people away. AP Wolf chased Hutch away five years ago. It's time we move past that, or at least find another example, since AP doesn't post here any more either. And Cog seems to have made it his personal mission to slap wrists around here, so since there are 'too many people here who will viciously attack any point of view, etc', I want him to name just ONE...one poster who logs in for no reason other than to viciously attack every other poster, and who remarkably doesn't get dinged, suspended, or banned for it. With so many options for him to choose from, this should be an easy task.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Dave,

    What can we do to rectify the situation?

    Stop discussing all the tired old crap we've been regurgitating for the past 125 years.

    Come to our senses and realise that SY's finest were not necessarily telling the truth.

    Stop swapping ill-informed opinion and knuckle-down to some serious research.

    That would be a giant step forward.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Name one.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott
    I will Paul Begg

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    The medium is their choice and not ours to dictate.
    Hi Monty,

    With respect I guess the medium always was theirs to choose, so, not being funny, I don't entirely understand the point you're making...

    Leaving that aside, in your view, is there anything us average, run-of-the-mill, everyday posters can do (without infringing on normal human rights) to ensure that the diligent and conscientious researchers in our community don't get hammered?

    Dave

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X