You're prepared to argue facts about Chapman, with the foremost authority on Chapman, (and I defy you to find somebody up-to-date who'll disagree), without even bothering to read said authority's book...you then challenge said authority to provide a reason why you should invest something under £9 and a few hours reading...
You then have the sheer nerve to challenge people who've read the book...clearly the concept that every person in a debate is equal is a fallacy (and you can spell that how you like).
You then have the sheer nerve to challenge people who've read the book...clearly the concept that every person in a debate is equal is a fallacy (and you can spell that how you like).
Comment