Kelly's Home Office files

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Walter Lamb

    Hi Julie,

    The author wrote another friend of James Kelly was Walter Lamb of 37 Collingwood Street, near Buck's Row (Durward St). The star is the site of the Nichols murder.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Collingwood.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	182.2 KB
ID:	663931

    A Lamb family in the 1881 census at 19 Collingwood. Walter Lamb was two years younger than James Kelly. This part of Bethnal Green reaches almost to Whitechapel there.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	LAMB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	84.4 KB
ID:	663932

    Note Shop for occupation of wife Emma. George Lamb had a shop on that street in the 1882 directory.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Col82.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	16.5 KB
ID:	663933

    Leave a comment:


  • judyj
    replied
    Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
    Good afternoon Julie,



    John Morrison also wrote a book about James Kelly. I think you mean John Merritt, a London friend of James Kelly who was given 5 pounds. Police questioned him after the escape.

    Again, in regards to the Home Office file, yes I think author James Tully accessed it. And used parts of it in his book Prisoner 1167. Previously I had thought otherwise but changed my mind. Like you Julie I find him an interesting suspect. And one that no policeman would have mentioned in memoirs, he being escaped from the Home Office flagship prison/mental ward at the time.

    Roy
    Hi Roy
    That was a typing error only, John Merritt is 100% correct, I was obviously thinking of John Morrison ( the 1st to bring Kelly to forward as a suspect) when
    typing and inadvertently typed his name.
    Tks for correcting, I didn't notice it when I previewed my post.
    Regards julie

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Just as an aside - not evidence - he had the same birthday as Adolf Hitler.

    Regards, Bridewell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Good afternoon Julie,

    Originally posted by judyj View Post
    John Morrison, considered to be his best friend, who was paid 5 lbs to hold for him in case of emergency, and I believe he was more or less the trustee of James estate, through James solicitors. Hopefully I am stating this fact correctly.
    John Morrison also wrote a book about James Kelly. I think you mean John Merritt, a London friend of James Kelly who was given 5 pounds. Police questioned him after the escape.

    Again, in regards to the Home Office file, yes I think author James Tully accessed it. And used parts of it in his book Prisoner 1167. Previously I had thought otherwise but changed my mind. Like you Julie I find him an interesting suspect. And one that no policeman would have mentioned in memoirs, he being escaped from the Home Office flagship prison/mental ward at the time.

    Roy

    Leave a comment:


  • judyj
    replied
    Kellys Home Office Files

    Originally posted by Defective Detective View Post
    In the thread on the Jack The Ripper In America documentary, Roy Courderoy said the following

    'This is the first I've heard of such a file, presumably because I've not had the benefit of reading Prisoner 1167. I suppose the answer is given there, but I'll not likely have access to the book before the end of the year and so I'd like to ask: why were Kelly's records sealed for so long? And is there any idea what those seventeen redacted items were?
    Hi Roy

    I cannot answer this question with any proven facts,however, James Tully's book outlines interesting facts and questions concerning same. Refer to Chapter 11, COVER UP starting at P. 341.

    The book is a great read and was my 1st introduction to James Kelly, who became my suspect immediately. I've read many books on Jack over the years both well done, convincing and otherwise, however I have never been swayed from Kelly as my # 1 suspect. I am thrilled to see his name being investigated again. The book details James movements over the years, however there are not concrete facts of his actual whereabouts during the time of the murders,
    placing him there or not.
    With this taken into consideration, the comments made by many that his whereabouts were not known during this this time, in which many dismissed him as a suspect,is not taking into consideration that if you cannot prove he was there you certainly cannot prove that he wasn't.
    His unknown whereabouts should definately not dismiss him as a viable suspect,quite the contrary.

    The book offers interesting items re dollar worth at time of his entrance to Broadmoor ( 11,000 lbs in today's value) as well as two particular names associated with his escape:

    John Morrison, considered to be his best friend, who was paid 5 lbs to hold for him in case of emergency, and I believe he was more or less the trustee of James estate, through James solicitors. Hopefully I am stating this fact correctly.

    And George Stratton, an attendant, who was apparently instrumental in aiding his escape (explained in detail in the book)

    James Kelly died 7:15 AM, Sept 17th, 1929 in Block 3 of Broadmoor.

    I have had the book for some time. If there are questions that I can possibly answer for you, referencing the book, I would be glad to do so.

    Regards Julie

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Originally posted by prince View Post
    My understanding is that James Tulley was eventually given access to the Home Office file despite it being closed until 2030...."Finally came the magical moment when file number H.O. 144/10064 was placed in my eager hands. It contained ....." (page xiii of his book). Instructions had been given that no photocopies of pages could be made.
    Prince I think you are right. I have changed my mind after reading Tully's book more and also discussing this with Wolf V. The author did access the HO file, and used parts of it in his book, such as when Kelly tried to turn himself in to the British Consul in New Orleans in 1896.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A view of his birthplace in Preston, Lancashire. He "was born on April 20th, 1860, in No. 43, St Mary's Street. A small terraced house, it stood in the shadow of the forbidding Preston Prison -" Tully pg 2

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Preston4b1938b.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	168.7 KB
ID:	663543

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Preston3d.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	131.9 KB
ID:	663544

    Photos from this site

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by judyj View Post
    DW
    The sailor look was a hat if I'm not mistaken, and it was an older female
    that made that comment.
    regards
    Hello Judy. I beg your pardon ?

    Leave a comment:


  • judyj
    replied
    DW
    The sailor look was a hat if I'm not mistaken, and it was an older female
    that made that comment.
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • judyj
    replied
    James Kelly

    Hi DW

    No need to apologize, I am Julia actually, but I get called Julia, Julie and Judy.
    My user name is judy

    regards
    julie

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Sorry for calling you Julie, Judy...
    My eyes are no more what they used to be.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hello Julie, it is not that I necessarily disagree with your points, but valid or not, they do not make a good suspect.
    We don't know his whereabouts in 1888.
    We don't know JtR's motive, and syphilis is an old chestnut. You'll find plenty examples of prostitutes killers who didn't have this disease.
    As for the sailor, Lawende didn't properly see a sailor, it was just the cape - something that any labourer could wear.

    Leave a comment:


  • judyj
    replied
    James Kelly

    Hi again DW
    I'm a believer in what isn't obvious is more telling than what is.
    To me the fact that he could not be traced tells me alot about him, certainly he wasn't as insane as thought. He outsmarted the police force, and was on the run for many years or was he? Maybe he was in London all along. But I have to go back to my previous comments that if he did have STD, which I believe he did, the obvious place to have picked it up was physical contact with prostitutes. He was young, good looking and when I look at the picture of him, he strikes me as having a sailor look. I am sure he was out for revenge and got it., some witnesses described a man with a sailor look.

    It's apparent you do not agree with any of the points I have made, but I do appreciate your imput. Tell me who your fav suspect is.
    regards julie

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Julie, his personality may fit the Ripper's (in your opinion), and he may have a plausible motive (was it JtR motive, though ?), but where is the link between Kelly and the Whitechapel murders ? I cannot see any.

    Leave a comment:


  • judyj
    replied
    James Kelly

    Thanks for the reply. Aside from the reasons I listed, especially killing his wife by cutting her throat, he was found to be insane and sent to Broadmore. The fact that no one could find him after he escaped leads me to believe that he was smart, cunning and blended in. If he did indeed have STD and hated prostitutes, it's possible he blamed them for his std, failed marriage and ultimately his conviction for his wife's murder, and wanted revenge. I've read no less than 50 books on JTR and even though authors have put forward other suspects, and did very convincing jobs with backup documents and arguements
    but I come back to Kelly. His disappearane bothers me a great deal, too many unanswered questions. Tully's book was very well done (Prisoner 1167) and he made some very good points.
    Why do you wonder why he is a suspect?
    julie

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Hi Julie,
    I understand he could make a decent suspect, but have never understood why he should be suspected.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X