George or Jack

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Well then that just shows that it may not have been a punter prostitute encounter.
    Or maybe Blotchy was deaf?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Hi Gareth,

    Maybe that would have been your typical prostitute's aim, to seriously dampen the ardour of drunken punters after parting them from their pennies. I doubt these women did the business for their health.
    But she started singing the moment the door was closed, and continued for over an hour.

    Not hard to think of a motive now.

    Leave a comment:


  • FrankO
    replied
    "Burning heart"... One for Jack perhaps?

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    MJK : I've got you under my skin.

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    If I were a prostitute and a punter asked me to sing for him, I don't think I'd choose a dreary ballad about a lad reflecting on his loneliness by contemplating a flower from his mother's tomb. Equally, if I were the punter, that kind song would have had a seriously dampening effect on my ardour, especially after a few beers. I know that the Victorians were reputedly as randy as they were sentimental, but there's limits
    Hi Gareth,

    Maybe that would have been your typical prostitute's aim, to seriously dampen the ardour of drunken punters after parting them from their pennies. I doubt these women did the business for their health.

    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    I can see all the witty or smart ass posters on here (depending on your point of view) coming up with possible song titles.

    c.d.
    One for Jack to sing: I've got to get you onto my knife.

    And one for Mary when he was all done: Don't leave me this way.

    Love,

    Smart ass Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Well then that just shows that it may not have been a punter prostitute encounter.
    Indeed. Unless Blotchy was a bit kinkier than we might think.
    And if he was the ripper then the song makes perfect sense doesn't it ?
    In a strange way, you may be right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    If I were a prostitute and a punter asked me to sing for him, I don't think I'd choose a dreary ballad about a lad reflecting on his loneliness by contemplating a flower from his mother's tomb. Equally, if I were the punter, that kind song would have had a seriously dampening effect on my ardour, especially after a few beers. I know that the Victorians were reputedly as randy as they were sentimental, but there's limits
    Well then that just shows that it may not have been a punter prostitute encounter. And if he was the ripper then the song makes perfect sense doesn't it ? ; )

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    I can see all the witty or smart ass posters on here (depending on your point of view) coming up with possible song titles.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Killer or not maybe he enjoyed her singing. And how do you know he was a paying client?
    If I were a prostitute and a punter asked me to sing for him, I don't think I'd choose a dreary ballad about a lad reflecting on his loneliness by contemplating a flower from his mother's tomb. Equally, if I were the punter, that kind song would have had a seriously dampening effect on my ardour, especially after a few beers. I know that the Victorians were reputedly as randy as they were sentimental, but there's limits

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    I can see having a lookout for a robbery perhaps but I simply cannot imagine a scenario where you say to your buddy "hey I'm going to enter this woman's room and brutally butcher her. Would you mind keeping a lookout for any coppers?" We would have to imagine another incredibly sick individual who would agree with such a plan and if he were that sick and deranged wouldn't he want to be directly involved in the killing as well? Just can't see it.

    As a another poster suggested, maybe Hutchinson wasn't aware of the killers intent but that seems unlikely and what about afterwords wouldn't he have noticed the blood on the killer? And that brings up the reward money. Very, very tempting for someone of poor means living in Whitechapel.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    A lookout would be running up and down that passage like a yo-yo.

    This was a street loaded with doss-houses. People coming and going all night long, and McCarthy's shop at the corner was open 'till three o'clock.
    Even if a constable came into the street there's no reason to think he will enter Millers Court. Theorists seem to forget, unless the killer was covered in blood, there would be nothing suspicious about him - what was there to be concerned about?
    And if he was covered in blood, a lookout isn't going to help him any.

    In those days a killer could walk out of Millers court, right passed a constable, or a group of locals, and he had nothing to fear.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
    Workable scenarios arent that hard to imagine are they? I can think of a few off the top of my head;

    a) Wideawake is sent to wait and watch until all the courtyard traffic had ceased for the night. Then he would let whomever eventually kills her that the "coast was clear"
    Completely agree with that statement,however doubt Hutchinson realized he was going to be a lookout for a murder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by keffins View Post
    At 11:45 pm Mary Ann Cox,saw Kelly walking ahead of her with Blotchy.

    As Cox went into her home, she heard Kelly starting to sing “A Violet from Mother’s Grave”. - She started singing immediately.

    Catherine Pickett and her husband, remember hearing her singing at 12:30 am as well. Catherine remembered that she wanted to go shut Kelly up and her husband prevented her from doing so - possibly indicating rather loud singing.

    If MJK had taken Blotchy for professional reasons, surely he would be bored of her singing after 2 or 3 minutes, never mind 3/4 of an hour - and would have wanted some "action".

    At midnight, Cox went back out, and then came back an hour later at 1 am, the light was on in Kelly’s room and Cox could still hear her singing.
    This is now 1 hour and 15 minutes of potentially loud singing and probably no action for Blotchy.
    I just can't see him putting up with this and THEN murdering her. I feel if he was the killer, he would have snapped after 5 minutes or less.
    Killer or not maybe he enjoyed her singing. And how do you know he was a paying client? Maybe they were friends, or hook up, or maybe she was looking for a new sugar daddy and or boyfriend?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by keffins View Post
    At midnight, Cox went back out, and then came back an hour later at 1 am, the light was on in Kelly’s room and Cox could still hear her singing.
    This is now 1 hour and 15 minutes of potentially loud singing and probably no action for Blotchy.
    Was Cox correct in what she said?, if you recall Mrs Prater said there was no singing after 1:00 am, and no light from room 13 either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Varqm
    replied
    "Originally Posted by keffins View Post
    At 11:45 pm Mary Ann Cox,saw Kelly walking ahead of her with Blotchy.

    As Cox went into her home, she heard Kelly starting to sing “A Violet from Mother’s Grave”. - She started singing immediately.

    Catherine Pickett and her husband, remember hearing her singing at 12:30 am as well. Catherine remembered that she wanted to go shut Kelly up and her husband prevented her from doing so - possibly indicating rather loud singing.

    If MJK had taken Blotchy for professional reasons, surely he would be bored of her singing after 2 or 3 minutes, never mind 3/4 of an hour - and would have wanted some "action".

    At midnight, Cox went back out, and then came back an hour later at 1 am, the light was on in Kelly’s room and Cox could still hear her singing. This is now 1 hour and 15 minutes of potentially loud singing and probably no action for Blotchy. I just can't see him putting up with this and THEN murdering her. I feel if he was the killer, he would have snapped after 5 minutes or less.
    That part in bold is the best argument for Blotchy not having been a client. No-one pays street whores for concerts. I think Blotchy was to see Mary home, and then to report to someone else about her condition and the courtyards. he probably bought her drinks too.

    The weakness for alcohol with all of these women, and hundreds others in the district, was something that could be used against them...I think Kate was bought drinks Saturday afternoon to get her to chat.
    __________________
    Michael Richards "



    The thing though is, it does not say if Kelly was "continuously" singing the whole time.Blotchy could have used his mic for 2-4 minutes and Kelly could have resumed singing after the deed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X