Babybird:
"even if you truly believe that Leander hinted that he thought Toppy and Hutch might very well match"
I donīt believe that at all, Babybird - I believe that he told us explicitly that he would be surprised if they were NOT a genuine match, and that we therefore can conclude that he believes that Toppy was the Dorset Street witness.
"he stressed himself that his view was not to be taken as a professional report or opinion which he stressed to you that he could not give without seeing the original documents.
In light of the above, you really need to stop using Leander as if he has submitted a professional opinion on the matter, because he has not.
He has kindly given you an off the record personal, note, he himself says, NOT professional opinion.
In such a case Leander's opinion should carry no more weight than mine, yours, Ben's, David's etc etc."
Well, you see, Baybird, when Leander said that his opinion was not a full professional opinion, I donīt think that what he meant was that he would have stepped down in professional judgment and experience. My contention is that what he was saying wsa that he did not leave his assessment in his official professional capacity, as a member of the SKL team.
My, it IS interesting how many different scenarios you guys can come up with to try and invalidate and discredit the worth of the arguably best and most detailed investigation we have of the signatures! I canīt help but to wonder what will come next!
Fisherman
"even if you truly believe that Leander hinted that he thought Toppy and Hutch might very well match"
I donīt believe that at all, Babybird - I believe that he told us explicitly that he would be surprised if they were NOT a genuine match, and that we therefore can conclude that he believes that Toppy was the Dorset Street witness.
"he stressed himself that his view was not to be taken as a professional report or opinion which he stressed to you that he could not give without seeing the original documents.
In light of the above, you really need to stop using Leander as if he has submitted a professional opinion on the matter, because he has not.
He has kindly given you an off the record personal, note, he himself says, NOT professional opinion.
In such a case Leander's opinion should carry no more weight than mine, yours, Ben's, David's etc etc."
Well, you see, Baybird, when Leander said that his opinion was not a full professional opinion, I donīt think that what he meant was that he would have stepped down in professional judgment and experience. My contention is that what he was saying wsa that he did not leave his assessment in his official professional capacity, as a member of the SKL team.
My, it IS interesting how many different scenarios you guys can come up with to try and invalidate and discredit the worth of the arguably best and most detailed investigation we have of the signatures! I canīt help but to wonder what will come next!
Fisherman
Comment