MrBarnett
Fish,
He says if Maxwell was wrong, then Hutch was probably wrong.
He writes "And if Mrs. Maxwell was mistaken, is it not probable that George Hutchison erred also?"
I think it is just a way of phrasing the idea that if one could be wrong, that opens up for the possibility that the other can too.
If he’s just making the point that anyone can make a mistake, then why not Cox? Why does he link Maxwell and Hutch?
Because they were of the same ilk, I´d say - witnesses that were strong and reliable and who would not be expected to get things wrong. Cox was somebody Dew seemingly was a lot less impressed with. And Cox was right on the day, as proven by how others heard Kelly sing too, just as Cox did. Plus she had the weather right.
He explains why he believes Maxwell got her days wrong - because her account is contradicted by the medical evidence - but he gives no explanation for why he doubts Hutch, other than for some reason linking his evidence to Maxwells.
True, he does not say why it was decided that Hutch had made an error - but he does lay down that he DID err in some manner. Reasonably, it´s all about Lewis´ testimony and a comparison made to that.
And having dismissed Hutch’s evidence The Man Who Caught Crippen fingers blotchy as the only remaining option.
Not really, no. He simply says that Blotchy was his favoured suspect and he adds that he thinks Kelly died at around the time when he was there. It is a time that dovetails with Bonds suggested TOD and so Dew may have thought Bond reliable in this aspect.
But just as you imply, it is abundantly clear that Dew did NOT allow for Astrakhan man being linked to the murder night.
Fish,
He says if Maxwell was wrong, then Hutch was probably wrong.
He writes "And if Mrs. Maxwell was mistaken, is it not probable that George Hutchison erred also?"
I think it is just a way of phrasing the idea that if one could be wrong, that opens up for the possibility that the other can too.
If he’s just making the point that anyone can make a mistake, then why not Cox? Why does he link Maxwell and Hutch?
Because they were of the same ilk, I´d say - witnesses that were strong and reliable and who would not be expected to get things wrong. Cox was somebody Dew seemingly was a lot less impressed with. And Cox was right on the day, as proven by how others heard Kelly sing too, just as Cox did. Plus she had the weather right.
He explains why he believes Maxwell got her days wrong - because her account is contradicted by the medical evidence - but he gives no explanation for why he doubts Hutch, other than for some reason linking his evidence to Maxwells.
True, he does not say why it was decided that Hutch had made an error - but he does lay down that he DID err in some manner. Reasonably, it´s all about Lewis´ testimony and a comparison made to that.
And having dismissed Hutch’s evidence The Man Who Caught Crippen fingers blotchy as the only remaining option.
Not really, no. He simply says that Blotchy was his favoured suspect and he adds that he thinks Kelly died at around the time when he was there. It is a time that dovetails with Bonds suggested TOD and so Dew may have thought Bond reliable in this aspect.
But just as you imply, it is abundantly clear that Dew did NOT allow for Astrakhan man being linked to the murder night.
Comment