See, this is typical of why much of the criticism against Hutchinson is both self induced, and a bit of a fantasy.
The newspapers after the murder, over the weekend, were full of press theories about Kelly being murdered after 9:00 Friday morning. Around 7 hours after Hutchinson spoke to her at 2:00. Yet a handful of modern theorists expect him to rush to police to tell them he saw Kelly with a man 7 hours before she is presumed murdered?
What conceivable use would his sighting be to police in their investigation if the press theories were correct?
Then there is this preoccupation with the apparently false claim by the Star on Thursday, 15th, where it is claimed Hutchinson's story is discredited.
We can see how false the claim is by the fact the Star make no further mention of their claim, yet the very next day, the 16th, Galloway's story appeared in the press where we learn the police are looking for Astrachan.
Then again, three days later, on the 19th, the press report how the police are divided between pursuing both suspects, blotchy & Astrachan.
So, it is patently clear the report by the Star on the 15th was false, yet the alternate reports which demonstrate the police were still actively investigating Hutchinson's story are ignored.
Self-induced fantasy.
This, as one other member might recognize, is a perfect example of cherry-picking.
You refuse to accept the evidence as a whole, but prefer to only recognize what fits your own personal theory.
The newspapers after the murder, over the weekend, were full of press theories about Kelly being murdered after 9:00 Friday morning. Around 7 hours after Hutchinson spoke to her at 2:00. Yet a handful of modern theorists expect him to rush to police to tell them he saw Kelly with a man 7 hours before she is presumed murdered?
What conceivable use would his sighting be to police in their investigation if the press theories were correct?
Then there is this preoccupation with the apparently false claim by the Star on Thursday, 15th, where it is claimed Hutchinson's story is discredited.
We can see how false the claim is by the fact the Star make no further mention of their claim, yet the very next day, the 16th, Galloway's story appeared in the press where we learn the police are looking for Astrachan.
Then again, three days later, on the 19th, the press report how the police are divided between pursuing both suspects, blotchy & Astrachan.
So, it is patently clear the report by the Star on the 15th was false, yet the alternate reports which demonstrate the police were still actively investigating Hutchinson's story are ignored.
Self-induced fantasy.
This, as one other member might recognize, is a perfect example of cherry-picking.
You refuse to accept the evidence as a whole, but prefer to only recognize what fits your own personal theory.
Comment