A New Theory as to the Killer's Identity

[Pierre]

Nice try, but nope.

A satirical group of so called intellectuals.

[David Orsam]

The infamous Johnny Dear?!?

Nice try, but nope.

[David Orsam]

Hi David,

This isnīt a sociological experiment. It is reality.

I'm giving you reality Pierre.

Take a look at the attached editorial from The World of 9 November 1887. Do you see what I see?

[SirJohnFalstaff]

Inspired by Pierre, I have this afternoon formulated a new theory and, hey, I think I might or might not have found him. This is placing a terrible burden on me which I need to share with the members of this forum.

I intend to share my theory today but I want to tease you first. So if you want to know my suspect you have to play along.

This is really directed at Pierre so I hope you will have a crack at working it out Pierre. Here is the clue:

The surname of my suspect was included in plain English in at least two of the communications signed "Jack the Ripper" in 1888. Furthermore, my suspect was known to the police, having a criminal record, and was mentioned in correspondence passing between the Home Office and the Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police during the summer of 1888. He also lived in London during the latter part of 1888, having recently been released from prison on licence.

Can you work it out Pierre?

The infamous Johnny Dear?!?

[Pierre]

Inspired by Pierre, I have this afternoon formulated a new theory and, hey, I think I might or might not have found him. This is placing a terrible burden on me which I need to share with the members of this forum.

I intend to share my theory today but I want to tease you first. So if you want to know my suspect you have to play along.

This is really directed at Pierre so I hope you will have a crack at working it out Pierre. Here is the clue:

The surname of my suspect was included in plain English in at least two of the communications signed "Jack the Ripper" in 1888. Furthermore, my suspect was known to the police, having a criminal record, and was mentioned in correspondence passing between the Home Office and the Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police during the summer of 1888. He also lived in London during the latter part of 1888, having recently been released from prison on licence.

Can you work it out Pierre?

Hi David,

This isnīt a sociological experiment. It is reality.

But perhaps you are thinking of anyone of these guys:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lqLE6lSWeA

Regards Pierre

[Mayerling]

Inspired by Pierre, I have this afternoon formulated a new theory and, hey, I think I might or might not have found him. This is placing a terrible burden on me which I need to share with the members of this forum.

I intend to share my theory today but I want to tease you first. So if you want to know my suspect you have to play along.

This is really directed at Pierre so I hope you will have a crack at working it out Pierre. Here is the clue:

The surname of my suspect was included in plain English in at least two of the communications signed "Jack the Ripper" in 1888. Furthermore, my suspect was known to the police, having a criminal record, and was mentioned in correspondence passing between the Home Office and the Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police during the summer of 1888. He also lived in London during the latter part of 1888, having recently been released from prison on licence.

Can you work it out Pierre?

I'm sorry David, I can't help it. Was he bigger than a breadbox?

Jeff

[David Orsam]

Inspired by Pierre, I have this afternoon formulated a new theory and, hey, I think I might or might not have found him. This is placing a terrible burden on me which I need to share with the members of this forum.

I intend to share my theory today but I want to tease you first. So if you want to know my suspect you have to play along.

This is really directed at Pierre so I hope you will have a crack at working it out Pierre. Here is the clue:

The surname of my suspect was included in plain English in at least two of the communications signed "Jack the Ripper" in 1888. Furthermore, my suspect was known to the police, having a criminal record, and was mentioned in correspondence passing between the Home Office and the Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police during the summer of 1888. He also lived in London during the latter part of 1888, having recently been released from prison on licence.

Can you work it out Pierre?