Macnaghten as a suspect

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Victor
    replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    Your are either ignoring someone or you are not. If you respond then clearly you cant be ignoring them, you are acknowledging that they exist...
    Wrong.

    Putting someone on your "ignore list" is a facility of this forum, and it means that all posts from that person are not displayed (see the post from Dan earlier for an example of what this looks like)

    Dan is not replying to you - he can't see your posts - he is replying to Bailey and myself amongst others. Hence your comment "The Norder was clearly responding to my post which demonstrates that he was peeking at them.." is an intentionally false statement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Originally posted by Victor View Post
    Here you go Jeff - an example of you lying.

    Dan was clearly responding to my post rather than yours and then he showed a screen shot to prove it.
    Your are either ignoring someone or you are not. If you respond then clearly you cant be ignoring them, you are acknowledging that they exist...

    So there is no example of me lying here Victor. And again i refer you back to the definition: An intensionally false statement...

    I have consistantly ask Norder to back up his claims and provide the evidence.

    Why has he failed to do so?

    Attacking someone by trying to talk through a third person is completely dishonest and without back bone. If you have something to say to someone then at least you should have the guts to say it to their face.

    However you worm, he has accused me of lying.

    I have no disagreement with you or anybody else. I simply want Norder to provide proof or apologize.

    I see nothing unreasonable in that..and please note that I am replying to your post..not the other way around. And I am directing my comments at Dan Norder.

    Good day

    Pirate

    Leave a comment:


  • Victor
    replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    The Norder was clearly responding to my post which demonstrates that he was peeking at them..
    Here you go Jeff - an example of you lying.

    Dan was clearly responding to my post rather than yours and then he showed a screen shot to prove it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bailey
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan Norder View Post
    Hi Bailey,

    Colin? Conflict with me? Not really. We disagree on the Cross naming thing, but I respect his opinion nonetheless. Otherwise from my recollection we tend to agree on most other topics (at least from the ones Colin has weighed in on one way or another, as I have no idea what he thinks about other topics). Colin regularly posts information that argues against the claims made by Paul Begg about Anderson and Kosminski which I also find equally troubling, and which Jeff usually freaks out about and starts insulting everyone for daring to think that the great, all-knowing Paul Begg could ever be wrong.
    Hey Dan

    My bad then - I'd thought I recalled the two of you (Dan and Colin that is) butting heads on another thread recently. Must've been mistaken, or at least memory made a mountain out of a molehill of friendly disagreement.

    As for yourself vs Jeff... I remain on the sideline, enjoying watching the game Even if it does seem at times like only one of you is playing.

    Cheers,
    B.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan Norder View Post
    Hi Bailey,
    Colin? Conflict with me? Not really. We disagree on the Cross naming thing, but I respect his opinion nonetheless. Otherwise from my recollection we tend to agree on most other topics (at least from the ones Colin has weighed in on one way or another, as I have no idea what he thinks about other topics). Colin regularly posts information that argues against the claims made by Paul Begg about Anderson and Kosminski which I also find equally troubling, and which Jeff usually freaks out about and starts insulting everyone for daring to think that the great, all-knowing Paul Begg could ever be wrong.
    The Norder Splatter guns and hopes for the best...However he still provides no examples of where the Pirate has ever 'LIED"

    Thats because he has none...

    As fore insulting everyone..its another Norder lie..I have insulted only the Norder..and you started it..why dont you just with draw your statement that I'm a liar...I'm NOT..never have been... Never have...

    Pirate

    "we are the boys that will stop your little game....so who do you think"

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Norder
    replied
    Hi Bailey,

    Originally posted by Bailey View Post
    I see that you also tend to appear regulalrly in conflict with Mr Norder - Dan, seems you have a knack for getting up people's noses - which is between yourselves, but I don't see any need to leap all over someone who expresses an opinion which coincides with Dan's so hastily.
    Colin? Conflict with me? Not really. We disagree on the Cross naming thing, but I respect his opinion nonetheless. Otherwise from my recollection we tend to agree on most other topics (at least from the ones Colin has weighed in on one way or another, as I have no idea what he thinks about other topics). Colin regularly posts information that argues against the claims made by Paul Begg about Anderson and Kosminski which I also find equally troubling, and which Jeff usually freaks out about and starts insulting everyone for daring to think that the great, all-knowing Paul Begg could ever be wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • Septic Blue
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    As for your assumption that Colin ...
    Many Thanks, Jeff !!!


    Colin Click image for larger version

Name:	Septic Blue.gif
Views:	112
Size:	12.4 KB
ID:	654556


    P.S. Blow yer bubbles up yer Arsenal !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by Bailey View Post
    Be careful of looking silly...

    B.
    With Herfort hanging around, everybody looks like a genius...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Originally posted by Bailey View Post
    Actually, Jeff, I don't think you've got anything there, dude. He isn't quoting you, he's quoting the icon that blocks your post. I'm giving that point to Dan. Be careful of looking silly...

    B.
    No he is NOT...he's quite clearly peeking in and we all know it...his pride gets in the way...

    As for your assumption that Colin has a problem with Norder... your probably wrong about that...

    Colin is his own man, and dispite the fact that on the whole I disagree about his veiws on Jack the Ripper...he just is cool....you've got it or you aint..Colins an East end boy...I disagree with'im but he knows his music..

    Where as Norder is what we used to call at school the Butt...

    The brainy kid who ran off and grassed everyone to teacher..

    So I know he's lissening in..now..arnt you Norder..?

    Personally I don't care because I hang out with people who have forgotten more about the Jack the Ripper case than Norder will ever know...

    And Norder should not have upset them..

    However Bailey I really have know problems with anybody else on casebook..

    And I must admit that I was stirring things for reaction when I posted about Lechmere, I just get bored when I'm editing and Norder baiting breaks the manotany (sorry My dyslexia is having problems with that word)

    Be warned however Colin is a much brighter target to take on...and a much nicer human being..

    Catch you in the next fun ride..

    Pirate

    "just because we're on the run..."

    Leave a comment:


  • Celesta
    replied
    Originally posted by Bailey View Post
    Bwahahah! I didn't spot that! Well done David for spotting it, and to Sophie / Strong / whoever for coming up with it

    B. (Always respectful of a good pun, and even more so of a bad one)

    Well, I guess her English has improved since last summer. She used to be a member of this site, Bailey, but didn't post much.

    Best,

    Cel

    Oops! I take it back. After having reviewed some of these posts, I see the English is roughly the same as the last time. Better than my French of course. It started out sounding alright but the angrier she gets the more it slips.
    Last edited by Celesta; 08-06-2008, 11:25 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bailey
    replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    And Norder responded again!!!!!!!

    Yes..what more proof do you need...


    Pirate
    Actually, Jeff, I don't think you've got anything there, dude. He isn't quoting you, he's quoting the icon that blocks your post. I'm giving that point to Dan. Be careful of looking silly...

    B.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bailey
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan Norder View Post
    I highly recommend putting the complete and utter nutjobs into your personal ignore list.

    It makes all the insane ranting and raving turn into this:

    [ATTACH]2850[/ATTACH]
    With all due respect, Dan, that's a much less fun version of what I'm seeing.

    B.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bailey
    replied
    Originally posted by Septic Blue View Post

    If we do not take the progressive route, and refer to people, places and events in accordance with recent discoveries; then we will remain stagnant and go nowhere in our quest.

    Also; if we show blatant disregard for the work of Michael Connor and Chris Scott, and allow it - like Derek Osborne's - to fade into obscurity, then this whole saga will be repeated in seven-or-eight years, when someone else 'discovers' Charles Lechmere, of 22 Doveton Street, Mile End Old Town.


    Colin
    Colin,

    A very fair point, with which I do not disagree, and so I stand corrected. However I also agree with the comment elsewhere that using "Cross" would prevent people having to scurry away and look up Lechmere to figure out who we were talking about. From the argument you make, I guess this would in fact be a good thing - perhaps we would all do well to continue to update our references to keep up with discoveries.

    HOWEVER, Colin, I don't think I'm unreasonable in saying you came on a little strong there? A lot of bolds and triple exclamation marks (refer Terry Pratchett for his comments on the sanity of those who indulge in gratuitous punctuation abuse) all added up to me feeling rather like I was being abused, which I don't especially care for. I see that you also tend to appear regulalrly in conflict with Mr Norder - Dan, seems you have a knack for getting up people's noses - which is between yourselves, but I don't see any need to leap all over someone who expresses an opinion which coincides with Dan's so hastily.

    B.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bailey
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    And this time Sophie Herfort comes back slyly under an alias, "She Strong", which is a pathetic pun (She=more or less "her", Strong=fort), and she tells us she's a Cypriote citizen...
    Bwahahah! I didn't spot that! Well done David for spotting it, and to Sophie / Strong / whoever for coming up with it

    B. (Always respectful of a good pun, and even more so of a bad one)

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan Norder View Post
    I highly recommend putting the complete and utter nutjobs into your personal ignore list.

    It makes all the insane ranting and raving turn into this:

    [ATTACH]2850[/ATTACH]

    And Norder responded again!!!!!!!

    Yes..what more proof do you need...

    He waggles around these boards like Captain Manoring pionting out everybody elses errors....

    But when it comes to the TRUTH, Dan Norder wouldnt recognise it if it jumped up a bit him on the....

    Now he's telling everyone else to use their 'Ignore buttons" dispite the fact that he doesnt seem to follow his own advice..

    Just digging his grave deeper and deeper..

    Priceless stuff..you are great entertainment

    Pirate

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X