Macnaghten as a suspect

[Bailey]

Jeff, do us a favour, mate, put Norder on ignore, neither you nor him read anything quoting the other, and maybe the rest of us can get on.

This time yesterday I was finding all this quite entertaining, but 24 hours later the novelty has worn off and it's all a bit silly, and not in a good, Graham Chapman in a general's uniform sort of way. Let's get back to the subject at hand, shall we, rather than quoting dictionaries at each other and splitting hairs to no good end?

B.

[Jeff Leahy]

Victor a Duck is a Duck, it doesn't have a propensity to be a penguin.

Norder claimed to be "Ignoring me" he put me on 'ignore' he RESPONDED.

Which meant he was NOT ignoring me, It really is very simple. If he choose to do that via you, the queen or anybody else..he responded.

One either chooses to ignore someone or one does NOT.

This has absolutely nothing to do with anything else or anybody else, so stop trying to change the debate and move the goal posts....

stick to the Duck

Pirate

[Victor]

The word 'Ignore' means 'Ignore"

depending upon context.

if you push a button that says 'ignore' you are 'Ignoring" it still means the same thing...

Completely wrong. If you push a button it fulfils it's function irrespective of what it's labelled

And what does Paul Begg have to do with all this?

That was a riposte for you impling I was Norder - but then you did actually reply as Begg at one point.

I think your clarsping at straws now but carry on contradicting if you wish...and before you like Norder claim unfair...remember you started this 'Argument/contradiction' I am simply RESPONDING

Pirate

[Jeff Leahy]

This is just contradiction Victor..

The word 'Ignore' means 'Ignore" if you push a button that says 'ignore' you are 'Ignoring" it still means the same thing...

And what does Paul Begg have to do with all this?

I think your clarsping at straws now but carry on contradicting if you wish...and before you like Norder claim unfair...remember you started this 'Argument/contradiction' I am simply RESPONDING

Pirate

[Victor]

No clarification necessary we know exactly what Dan means and check out your post #48:-

Luckily enough he currently has me on his ‘ignore’ setting which means that he is unable to read this post! I’m invisible to him . Which is excellent because I can now point out his errors to people without him realizing that I am doing it….

Oh dear are you contradicting yourself again or is it Paul Begg responding AGAIN. You do know what it means and are just arguing for the sake of it. Until now I gave you the benefit of the doubt but you are clearly proving Dan right.

And post #70 clearly shows you what it looks like.

So that's conclusive proved "Pirate Jack" aka Jeff is an argumentative twit, who doesn't know when to quit even when you quote his own words back at him. I no longer need to reply. 'Tis done.

ps Enjoy Devils Dyke, unfortunately I can't make it I've got work.

[Jeff Leahy]

If you wish to try and imply that the word 'Ignore' means something completely different in casebook terms that is up to you...

However i took the word to mean exactly what it says on the tin...

What the Norder took the word to mean you can only hazard a guess at because as you say 'you are in Sunny brighton' and I had no way of knowing that, as your profile dosn't say where you are....

However I have more respect than to call you a liar Victor, I will take you at your word...

Until Norder actually responds we don't know what he meant by the term 'Ignore" perhaps he thought it something completely different..

The problem you have Victor is that you are in a catch twenty two..if the Norder does respond he is as they say RESPONDING..

So it looks like that arguement is over unless you wish to dabble in contradiction

Enjoy sunny Brighton..I might be a Devils Dyke tomorrow if you fancy paragliding?

Pirate

[Victor]

Are you disputing the Oxford English dictionary Norder?

He aint gonna reply to you, he's got you on "ignore" - the definition of ignore that is appropriate in this situation and not any old definition you decide to use.

And I believe that Dan is in the states, whereas I'm in Sunny Brighton, but if you want to fling around random accusations.... Oh you've been doing that for a while now

[Iain Wilson]

Ho ho ho

[Jeff Leahy]

Is that the five minute arguement or the full half hour

[Iain Wilson]

Arguing on the internet is SO pointless.

[Jeff Leahy]

Are you disputing the Oxford English dictionary Norder?

[Victor]

Ignore: Refuse to take notice of or accept

Again, wrong.

Ignore: A facility of this forum to block your posts from displaying on his screen.

[Jeff Leahy]

Ignore: Refuse to take notice of or accept.

Norder: and which Jeff usually freaks out about and starts insulting everyone for daring to think that the great, all-knowing Paul Begg could ever be wrong.

Perhaps Victor, Mr Norder is reffering to another Pirate? Perhaps I got it all wrong? perhaps Norder was in fact reffering to a majestic herd of wilderbeast majestically crossing the serrengetti?

The above statement is a responce aimed at me..noone else...its personal and its not even true...I dont freak out as he puts it, I dont insult everyone s he puts it, and I've never claimed that anybody is above making mistakes..

We all make mistakes, as you are clearly doing now..

And passing your comments via someone else Norder is getting rather tedious.

Pirate

[Victor]

No I'm confirming that he isn't going to see YOUR posts, but he can see when others quote you.

[Jeff Leahy]

No it is not...Dan was responding to my statements by returning comment..are you suggesting that he believe I wasn't going to see his posts...?

Norder had the opportunity to say nothing but choose to RESPOND..