I think I have found him.

[David Orsam]

Really? That's interesting because I distinctly recall you telling us that if you revealed the identity of your suspect then evidence might be destroyed.

In fact, I can cite the exact post. It was #771 in this thread. You said:

"The reasons I can´t reveal my theory before my work is finished are two: it might destroy evidence - and there is the ethical aspect of accusing innocent people."

When I asked you how this evidence would be destroyed, you said in #790:

"I wish I could tell you where this evidence is being held but I can´t."

Yet when Amanda says that "the data is out of their control" you tell us that this is a problem you "don't have".

There is a contradiction here isn't there? Either the data is in your control, and being held by you, so that there is no risk of destruction or it is out of your control and risks being destroyed.

Are you lying to us Pierre?

Repeating this because I think it does require a response.

[Pierre]

I think I have found him.

Yes! I have found David!

[David Orsam]

Yes! I have found David!

Is this the breakdown that has long been on the cards?

[David Orsam]

Really? That's interesting because I distinctly recall you telling us that if you revealed the identity of your suspect then evidence might be destroyed.

In fact, I can cite the exact post. It was #771 in this thread. You said:

"The reasons I can´t reveal my theory before my work is finished are two: it might destroy evidence - and there is the ethical aspect of accusing innocent people."

When I asked you how this evidence would be destroyed, you said in #790:

"I wish I could tell you where this evidence is being held but I can´t."

Yet when Amanda says that "the data is out of their control" you tell us that this is a problem you "don't have".

There is a contradiction here isn't there? Either the data is in your control, and being held by you, so that there is no risk of destruction or it is out of your control and risks being destroyed.

Are you lying to us Pierre?

Is your sudden string of posts to me and/or about me, Pierre, caused by the above?

[GUT]

Is your sudden string of posts to me and/or about me, Pierre, caused by the above?

But that's because Pierre is "Full of it".

[GUT]

BULL$H!T

That's the one.

[Graham]

oh Dear Pierre, We Thee Implore
To Bugger Off And Bore No More.
But If That Effort Be Too Great,
Just Bugger Off At Any Rate.

G

[GUT]

oh Dear Pierre, We Thee Implore
To Bugger Off And Bore No More.
But If That Effort Be Too Great,
Just Bugger Off At Any Rate.

G

Where's the like button?

[curious]

oh Dear Pierre, We Thee Implore
To Bugger Off And Bore No More.
But If That Effort Be Too Great,
Just Bugger Off At Any Rate.

G

Thanks! I've been missing the fun this thread once was.

[Elamarna]

Dear Pierre.

I may have missed this but have been told you have a confession by the killer?

Now I don't always believe everything I am told here, is it true?

If not that’s end of the question.

If it is, can you say the type it is, without mentioning any details of course.

By that I mean is it a letter, diary, 3rd party document detailing a confession, that sort of thing.

regards

Elamarna

[Pierre]

Dear Pierre.

I may have missed this but have been told you have a confession by the killer?

Now I don't always believe everything I am told here, is it true?

If not that’s end of the question.

If it is, can you say the type it is, without mentioning any details of course.

By that I mean is it a letter, diary, 3rd party document detailing a confession, that sort of thing.

regards

Elamarna

Hi,

Yes, there is a confession. I can´t tell you what type it is yet. Sorry about that.

Regards Pierre

[Elamarna]

Why not Pierre.?

It's a general question the answer to which gives nothing away.

This is why people get upset. You always ask the rest of us questions. Which are generally answered in detail.

When ever you are asked a general question which does not disclose your suspect or actual source you refused to answer. Why is that?

[Hercule Poirot]

Why not Pierre? ...Why is that?

Why? Answer:

[AlanG]

wow! I think I can taste my dinner again.

[Gene Lewis]

Scratching blisters

Reading Pierre's drivels has something to do with scratching a blister: you know it sucks but insist however...