Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I think I have found him.
Collapse
X
-
What so the casebook faceebook discovered a new poi and have found some interesting info that points to him being the ripper? and they are keeping it silent in orderr not to offend his relative? and pierre's suspect is the same person, that he found independently or is one of the members of the fb group using an alias?
Comment
-
And why should we be quiet about "Crampton"? I thought Tom was writing the le grand book. He's jumped ships?
Do you have something in the cooperation with the suspect's descendant, some type of commercial deal where those involved are worried the grandson will destroy evidence? If it's a grandson, then it would seem you are discussing a "PC" Initials can be quite useful when it is necessary to discuss a suspect without naming them so it doesn't turn up on google search. I find nothing when searching this name other than his father is discussed in letters from Queen V during the Ripper murders.Last edited by RockySullivan; 11-20-2015, 07:46 PM.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Phil Carter;360961]Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
Hi Pinkmoon,
I have been asking around. .and nobody. . To my knowledge, has given Pierre the tip off. Including moi. The fb group is pretty tight on the important bits imho.
What this site knows is findable anyway. The juicy stuff is pretty safe I reckon.
Pockets
Now I'm curious about how your quoting mechanism in your PC managed to attribute a comment from Pinkmoon to me. That is curious.
Jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by RockySullivan View PostAnd why should we be quiet about "Crampton"? I thought Tom was writing the le grand book. He's jumped ships?
Do you have something in the cooperation with the suspect's descendant, some type of commercial deal where those involved are worried the grandson will destroy evidence? If it's a grandson, then it would seem you are discussing a "PC" Initials can be quite useful when it is necessary to discuss a suspect without naming them so it doesn't turn up on google search. I find nothing when searching this name other than his father is discussed in letters from Queen V during the Ripper murders.Last edited by RockySullivan; 11-20-2015, 08:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostI am really sorry and I do not wish to be disrespectful at all. However for weeks people have been having a go at Pierre for not saying a name.
Indeed there was even a spoof in the pub talk section.
Now suddenly we have the same from a respected group of posters.
Not only are they doing the very same thing. They are saying it's not in anyone's interest to even discuss their theory.
.
Some of the posts are almost coming across as if they are in fear.
Sorry is this all about Comercial interest of have they simply lost the plot
With the deepest regret this is becoming a complete farce and doing no good at all for this forum.
Regards to all
Comment
-
Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
I only posted on here to see if my friends had blabbed about grampton I'm pretty sure by your reaction they havnt I do think I have chosen at least one of my gramptonites as they have been christened unwiselythere,s nothing new, only the unexplored
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Mayerling;360972]Originally posted by Phil Carter View Post
Hi Phil,
Now I'm curious about how your quoting mechanism in your PC managed to attribute a comment from Pinkmoon to me. That is curious.
Jeff
Yeah..me too!!..sorry about that. Lol
PhilChelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙
Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Comment
-
Hi Rocky
I must be stupid because I don't know what you "pc☺" means.
Robert,
I know I only registered in last year or so and not posted much . However I have been visiting this forum since before the big crash. And I have to agree with you comment.
It appears that finding the truth no longer is the primary aim.
Regards
Comment
-
Hopefully someone breaks it wide open before the Secret Bretheren of the Gramptonites decide to enlighten us!
I don't know if I can wait that long!"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
.
Jack The Ripper is a long ago unsolved case with an extremely limited audience that really gives a hoot. There's been so many people peddling solutions in the past ten years that Ripperology has become a farce to the casual observer.
But we don't want to steal anyone's "thunder" and we don't want to ruin anyone's chance of getting super mega-rich off the Ripper case. Because that's working out so well for everyone else selling a solution. At this point there's been so many who have "solved" the case that even if someone really does solve it, it's likely to get them no more than a few exclamations of "good job!" and a couple of interviews.
I'm not really sure where I'm heading with this. Just venting, I guess. Don't mind me.....Last edited by Brenda; 11-21-2015, 09:43 AM.
Comment
-
.
Thanks Rocky. I don't mean to sound like I am throwing shade at Ripper research, at all. I have very much enjoyed the adventures of the researchers through the years, as my life right now doesn't allow much time for that sort of thing, but I do love research.
I think what really annoys me is the attitude of self-importance. It's an old murder case, but some act like they are sitting on the cure for cancer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brenda View PostThanks Rocky. I don't mean to sound like I am throwing shade at Ripper research, at all. I have very much enjoyed the adventures of the researchers through the years, as my life right now doesn't allow much time for that sort of thing, but I do love research.
I think what really annoys me is the attitude of self-importance. It's an old murder case, but some act like they are sitting on the cure for cancer.
And when I´m finished with this, perhaps all we will have is...silence.
Pierre
Comment
Comment